IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p3073-d1371487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of Open Space Planning within a Developing, Biodiverse City (Durban, South Africa)

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron T. McLean

    (School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Pvt Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
    Biodiversity Management Department, eThekwini Municipality, Durban 4001, South Africa)

  • Debra C. Roberts

    (School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Pvt Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
    Sustainable and Resilient City Initiatives Unit, eThekwini Municipality, Durban 4001, South Africa
    Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, 7500 Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Rob Slotow

    (Centre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Pvt Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
    Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

Abstract

Conserving and restoring biodiversity is central to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. The need to curb biodiversity loss through the mainstreaming of biodiversity considerations within land-use planning is consistently highlighted in global biodiversity assessments intended for policymakers and practitioners. We present a Global South local government-led examination of the mainstreaming of biodiversity issues within a biodiversity hotspot area. Here, we evaluated the four-decade-long evolution in open space planning in Durban, South Africa, in response to shifting urbanisation, governance and policy/legislative contexts. We assessed the role of science in responding to contextual changes, the need for champions, and key institutional interventions undertaken to embed a biodiversity function within local government. In addition, we investigated how biodiversity concerns have been incorporated into land-use planning applications via the city’s environmental planning function. We provide evidence of the advancement of mainstreaming biodiversity concerns within local government processes, institutional functions, and land-use decision-making. This has been achieved through effective and sustained leadership; the use of science and scientific information in advancing the policy and legislative environment and building political support by responding to shifting governance contexts; investment in institutional scientific capacity and generating scale-appropriate biodiversity information. Learnings from this paper may be useful for other local governments addressing biodiversity loss through land-use planning processes, by identifying critical investment areas that may shorten the time required for effective mainstreaming.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron T. McLean & Debra C. Roberts & Rob Slotow, 2024. "The Evolution of Open Space Planning within a Developing, Biodiverse City (Durban, South Africa)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:3073-:d:1371487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/3073/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/3073/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeff Manuel & Kristal Maze & Mandy Driver & Anthea Stephens & Emily Botts & Azisa Parker & Mahlodi Tau & John Dini & Stephen Holness & Jeanne Nel, 2016. "Key Ingredients, Challenges and Lessons from Biodiversity Mainstreaming in South Africa: People, Products, Process," OECD Environment Working Papers 107, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:3073-:d:1371487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.