IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p2135-d1351196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the Financial and Climate Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Abatement Pathways in Residential Space Heating

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Dill

    (Department of Sustainable Resources Management, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

  • Tristan R. Brown

    (Department of Sustainable Resources Management, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

  • Robert W. Malmsheimer

    (Department of Sustainable Resources Management, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

  • HakSoo Ha

    (Department of Sustainable Resources Management, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

  • Jenny Frank

    (Environmental and Renewable Resources Division, SUNY Morrisville, 80 Eaton St, Morrisville, NY 13408, USA)

  • Pradheep Kileti

    (Gas Asset Management and Engineering National Grid, 25 Hub Dr, Melville, NY 11747, USA)

  • Brian Barkwill

    (Gas Asset Management and Engineering National Grid, 25 Hub Dr, Melville, NY 11747, USA)

Abstract

New York State (NYS) has set strict greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets across all sectors of its economy, including the heating sector. This study examines the financial value and environmental impacts of the residential space heating sector in NYS under different GHG abatement options by comparing the existing natural gas heating pathway with three potential GHG abatement pathways: renewable natural gas (RNG), hydrogen blended into RNG, and air-source heat pumps (ASHPs). These pathways are analyzed via a comparative net present value (NPV) framework from 2022 to 2042 with the emission reduction represented as a revenue stream that serves as a function of the social cost of GHGs. The investment timing of each of these pathways is also accounted for to reflect the pathways’ varying deployment timelines. The ASHP pathway with a 10% financial discount rate and a 2% social cost of the GHG discount rate achieves the lowest NPV. The RNG pathway achieves the highest NPV. A sensitivity analysis determines the impact of key factors on the NPV results. This study aims to inform policymakers, homeowners, and stakeholders of the potential benefits and costs of each of the four pathways to aid them in their decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Dill & Tristan R. Brown & Robert W. Malmsheimer & HakSoo Ha & Jenny Frank & Pradheep Kileti & Brian Barkwill, 2024. "Quantifying the Financial and Climate Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Abatement Pathways in Residential Space Heating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2135-:d:1351196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2135-:d:1351196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.