IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p2035-d1349039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergism of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Development Goals Techniques to Evaluate Downflow Hanging Sponge System Treating Low-Carbon Wastewater

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Anang

    (Environmental Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), Alexandria 21934, Egypt)

  • Mahmoud Nasr

    (Environmental Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), Alexandria 21934, Egypt
    Sanitary Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt)

  • Manabu Fujii

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-Ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan)

  • Mona G. Ibrahim

    (Environmental Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), Alexandria 21934, Egypt
    Environmental Health Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt)

Abstract

While recent researchers have focused on optimizing the operational conditions of low-carbon wastewater treatment processes, they have not sufficiently evaluated the sustainability of such systems. This study is the first to assess the performance of a low-carbon wastewater treatment facility using an integration of techno-economic and life cycle assessment (LCA) criteria accompanied by several sustainability indicators. A downflow hanging sponge (DHS) reactor was operated at a hydraulic retention time of 3.4 h, an organic loading rate of 3.8 kg COD/m 3 sponge/d, and 24–35 °C (scenario_1). Another two DHSs were operated in parallel, i.e., a 50% influent bypass (scenario_2) and 260 mg/L charcoal addition (scenario_3), providing carbonaceous matter to maintain the nitrification/denitrification pathway. Employing the DHS’s scenario_3 could fulfill most of the SDGs regarding the environmental (e.g., COD and nitrogen removals) and socio-economic (e.g., reliability, labor, and health and safety) targets. The LCA tool also confirmed the superior environmental benefits of scenario_3, concerning effluent quality, GHG emissions, and sludge generation. The synergistic interaction of LCA and SDGs approaches ranked the proposed DHS modifications as scenario_3 > scenario_1 > scenario_2. Hence, the current study provided an innovative strategy that could be employed to assess the sustainability of wastewater treatment systems worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Anang & Mahmoud Nasr & Manabu Fujii & Mona G. Ibrahim, 2024. "Synergism of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Development Goals Techniques to Evaluate Downflow Hanging Sponge System Treating Low-Carbon Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2035-:d:1349039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2035/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2035/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdelsalam Zidan & Mahmoud Nasr & Manabu Fujii & Mona G. Ibrahim, 2023. "Environmental and Economic Evaluation of Downflow Hanging Sponge Reactors for Treating High-Strength Organic Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Lanzetta & Francesco Di Capua & Balamurugan Panneerselvam & Davide Mattioli & Giovanni Esposito & Stefano Papirio, 2023. "Impact of Influent Composition and Operating Conditions on Carbon and Nitrogen Removal from Urban Wastewater in a Continuous-Upflow (Micro)Aerobic Granular Sludge Blanket Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2035-:d:1349039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.