IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1376-d1334527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Streamflow Prediction Physically Consistently Using Process-Based Modeling and Domain Knowledge: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Bisrat Ayalew Yifru

    (Agriculture and Life Sciences Research Institute, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si 24341, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea)

  • Kyoung Jae Lim

    (Department of Regional Infrastructure Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si 24341, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea)

  • Seoro Lee

    (Agriculture and Life Sciences Research Institute, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si 24341, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Streamflow prediction (SFP) constitutes a fundamental basis for reliable drought and flood forecasting, optimal reservoir management, and equitable water allocation. Despite significant advancements in the field, accurately predicting extreme events continues to be a persistent challenge due to complex surface and subsurface watershed processes. Therefore, in addition to the fundamental framework, numerous techniques have been used to enhance prediction accuracy and physical consistency. This work provides a well-organized review of more than two decades of efforts to enhance SFP in a physically consistent way using process modeling and flow domain knowledge. This review covers hydrograph analysis, baseflow separation, and process-based modeling (PBM) approaches. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of each technique and a discussion of their applications. Additionally, the existing techniques are categorized, revealing research gaps and promising avenues for future research. Overall, this review paper offers valuable insights into the current state of enhanced SFP within a physically consistent, domain knowledge-informed data-driven modeling framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Bisrat Ayalew Yifru & Kyoung Jae Lim & Seoro Lee, 2024. "Enhancing Streamflow Prediction Physically Consistently Using Process-Based Modeling and Domain Knowledge: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-27, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1376-:d:1334527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1376/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1376/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juliane Mai & James R. Craig & Bryan A. Tolson & Richard Arsenault, 2022. "The sensitivity of simulated streamflow to individual hydrologic processes across North America," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Shahab Araghinejad & Nima Fayaz & Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari, 2018. "Development of a Hybrid Data Driven Model for Hydrological Estimation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(11), pages 3737-3750, September.
    3. Ming Zhong & Hongrui Zhang & Tao Jiang & Jun Guo & Jinxin Zhu & Dagang Wang & Xiaohong Chen, 2023. "A Hybrid Model Combining the Cama-Flood Model and Deep Learning Methods for Streamflow Prediction," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(12), pages 4841-4859, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anas Mahmood Al-Juboori, 2021. "A Hybrid Model to Predict Monthly Streamflow Using Neighboring Rivers Annual Flows," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(2), pages 729-743, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1376-:d:1334527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.