IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1264-d1331935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regenerative Development Model: A Life Cycle-Based Methodology for the Definition of Regenerative Contribution Units (RCUs)

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Del Borghi

    (Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genova, 16145 Genoa, Italy)

  • Michela Gallo

    (Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genova, 16145 Genoa, Italy)

  • Erica Gagliano

    (Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genova, 16145 Genoa, Italy)

  • Vienna Eleuteri

    (BLYP, Be Like Your Place, 00197 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

In the “contributive” approach, balancing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions cannot be considered comprehensive, as all footprints, such as ecological and water, shall be assessed and balanced by regenerative actions contributing not only to carbon removal, but also to the regeneration of biodiversity, land, and water. A survey on existing methodologies for the assessment of the damage (environmental burden) and the calculation of the environmental repair (offsets) has been presented in this work. Its outcome pointed out a lack of scientific knowledge on how to put metrics beyond the regenerative development model and in particular on how life cycle assessment (LCA) can scientifically support a number of key features essential to develop a new methodology. The proposed approach is based on three pillars: reduce, remove, and repair. Indeed, this paper aims to develop a methodological LCA-based approach for the definition of Regenerative Contribution Units (RCUs) to quantitatively assess the contribution of projects in line with Sustainable Developments Goals (SDGs) and the framework of regenerative model development. These regenerative units might be marketed locally and globally by enterprises interested in purchasing such assets to scientifically and ethically comply with their corporate ESG obligations. Furthermore, the novelty and feasibility of the proposed approach has been preliminarily investigated through an example of footprints balancing.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Del Borghi & Michela Gallo & Erica Gagliano & Vienna Eleuteri, 2024. "Regenerative Development Model: A Life Cycle-Based Methodology for the Definition of Regenerative Contribution Units (RCUs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1264-:d:1331935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gallo, Michela & Del Borghi, Adriana & Strazza, Carlo & Parodi, Lara & Arcioni, Livia & Proietti, Stefania, 2016. "Opportunities and criticisms of voluntary emission reduction projects developed by Public Administrations: Analysis of 143 case studies implemented in Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1269-1282.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dusan Gordic & Vladimir Vukasinovic & Zoran Kovacevic & Mladen Josijevic & Dubravka Zivkovic, 2021. "Assessing the Techno-Economic Effects of Replacing Energy-Inefficient Street Lighting with LED Corn Bulbs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Michela Gallo & Luca Moreschi & Michela Mazzoccoli & Veronica Marotta & Adriana Del Borghi, 2020. "Sustainability in Maritime Sector: Waste Management Alternatives Evaluated in a Circular Carbon Economy Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1264-:d:1331935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.