IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p630-d1317024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valorisation of Forest and Agriculture Residual Biomass—The Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Analyse Composting, Mulching, and Energetic Valorisation Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel Brás

    (Department of Environment, School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic University of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal
    CISeD—Research Centre in Digital Services, Polytechnic University of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

  • Elisabete Silva

    (Department of Environment, School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic University of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal
    CISeD—Research Centre in Digital Services, Polytechnic University of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal
    LEPABE—Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Roberta Raimondo

    (Civil Engineering, Construction and Environment Department, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Nápoles, Italy)

  • Raffaella Saetta

    (Civil Engineering, Construction and Environment Department, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Nápoles, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Mignano

    (Civil Engineering, Construction and Environment Department, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Nápoles, Italy)

  • Massimiliano Fabbricino

    (Civil Engineering, Construction and Environment Department, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Nápoles, Italy)

  • José Ferreira

    (CERNAS-IPV Research Centre and ESTGV, Polytechnic University of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

Abstract

The treatment of agricultural and forest residues (AFRs) has become an important issue nowadays, both to avoid improper management and for their enhancement. In the study area of Viseu (Portugal), the AFRs are taken to a Residual Biomass Collection Centre. These are valorised in a Biomass Power Plant to produce electricity. Two further processes could be implemented to valorise this biomass: mulching and composting. This study aims to understand the best strategy to enhance this type of biomass residual considering their environmental performance. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was applied considering a cradle-to-grave approach. Different processes of all the technologies were analysed, and the data collected enabled a comparison of 11 environmental impact categories. The results show that composting is the best alternative, except for global warming and ozone layer depletion, and energy valorisation has the greatest impact on five of the considered categories. In the three processes, impacts are mainly associated with the production and shredding phases of the residual biomass, rather than the transportation stages, due to the short distances covered. In all cases, the value of the final product generates market consequences in terms of electricity and fertiliser production. In line with the aim of the study, its outcomes may provide scientific support to local decision makers in defining best practices in the management of the AFRs.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel Brás & Elisabete Silva & Roberta Raimondo & Raffaella Saetta & Vincenzo Mignano & Massimiliano Fabbricino & José Ferreira, 2024. "Valorisation of Forest and Agriculture Residual Biomass—The Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Analyse Composting, Mulching, and Energetic Valorisation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:630-:d:1317024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/630/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/630/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:630-:d:1317024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.