IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10452-d1532219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Spatial Pattern and Zoning of Ecological Vulnerability in Island and Territorial Waters Based on VSD Model—A Case Study of Juehua Island

Author

Listed:
  • Jingwen Li

    (School of Marine Science and Environment Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
    Operational Oceanography Institution, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China)

  • Yitong Yuan

    (School of Marine Science and Environment Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
    Operational Oceanography Institution, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China)

  • Yan Zhang

    (School of Marine Science and Environment Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
    Operational Oceanography Institution, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China)

  • Ming Liu

    (School of Marine Science and Environment Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
    Operational Oceanography Institution, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China)

Abstract

Research on the ecological vulnerability of islands can identify ecologically fragile areas, thereby providing support for the refined management of the ecological and environmental protection of islands and the rational development and utilization of island spaces. Using the ecosystem of Juehua Island (China) in Liaodong Bay and its surrounding marine regions as the study target, this work develops an ecological vulnerability index system for island sea areas based on the VSD model. The analytic hierarchy approach is used to calculate the weights of the indices, and the geographical pattern, zoning, and driving reasons for the ecological vulnerability of Juehua Island and its marine regions in 2019 are investigated. The findings indicate that the regional distribution of ecological vulnerability on Juehua Island varies greatly. In general, the vulnerability of the island land is spatially distributed as “high around and low in the middle”, with the surrounding sea region being non-vulnerable. The regional distribution of ecological vulnerability has considerable spatial agglomeration properties. The ecological vulnerability in the research region is primarily driven by the net primary production of the island land and the environmental quality of the marine water. Furthermore, specific ideas and strategies for the overall administration of Juehua Island have been proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingwen Li & Yitong Yuan & Yan Zhang & Ming Liu, 2024. "Study on the Spatial Pattern and Zoning of Ecological Vulnerability in Island and Territorial Waters Based on VSD Model—A Case Study of Juehua Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10452-:d:1532219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10452/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10452/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rui Bai & Ying Shi & Ying Pan, 2022. "Land-Use Classifying and Identification of the Production-Living-Ecological Space of Island Villages—A Case Study of Islands in the Western Sea Area of Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Miaofen Hu & Hongrui Zhang & Jun Tang & Shuiyu Yan, 2023. "Zoning and Optimization Strategies of Land Spatial Ecological Restoration in Liangjiang New Area of Chongqing Based on the Supply–Demand Relationship of Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Quero García, Pablo & Chica Ruiz, Juan Adolfo & García Sanabria, Javier, 2020. "Blue energy and marine spatial planning in Southern Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Yang, Jun & Ge, Yuting & Ge, Quansheng & Xi, Jianchao & Li, Xueming, 2016. "Determinants of island tourism development: The example of Dachangshan Island," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 261-271.
    5. Nan Wang & Jian Zu & Mu Li & Jinyi Zhang & Jinmin Hao, 2020. "Spatial Zoning of Cultivated Land in Shandong Province Based on the Trinity of Quantity, Quality and Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Andrei Mitrea & Krisztina Filepné Kovács & Gunta Lukstina & Evelin Jürgenson & Zuzana Ladzianska & Velislava Simeonova & Roman Lozynskyy & Vit Rezac & Viktori, 2022. "The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Spatial Planning Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Ledda & Marta Kubacka & Giovanna Calia & Sylwia Bródka & Vittorio Serra & Andrea De Montis, 2023. "Italy vs. Poland: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Planning System Attitudes toward Adaptation to Climate Changes and Green Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Małgorzata Blaszke & Iwona Foryś & Maciej J. Nowak & Bartosz Mickiewicz, 2022. "Selected Characteristics of Municipalities as Determinants of Enactment in Municipal Spatial Plans for Renewable Energy Sources—The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Daeyoung Jeong & Yun Eui Choi & Lilan Jin & Jinhyung Chon, 2019. "Impact of Spatial Change on Tourism by Bridge Connections between Islands: A Case Study of Ganghwa County in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Santiago Salvador & Marta Chantal Ribeiro, 2023. "Socio‐economic, legal, and political context of offshore renewable energies," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), March.
    5. Lisheng Weng & Bao-Jie He & Lina Liu & Chenxi Li & Xin Zhang, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment of Cultural Heritage Tourism: Case Study of Pingyao Ancient City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Jingjing Hao & Ling Zhang & Xiaofeng Ji & Xiaolong Wu & Lan Liu, 2020. "Investigating the Accessibility between Civil Airports and Tourist Locations in Tourist Cities in Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Hua Li & Dan Su & Yu Cao & Jiayi Wang & Yu Cao, 2022. "Optimizing the Compensation Standard of Cultivated Land Protection Based on Ecosystem Services in the Hangzhou Bay Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Dan Bărbulescu & Cerasella Craciun & Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă, 2023. "Protection of Environmental and Natural Values of Urban Areas against Investment Pressure: A Case Study of Romania and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, January.
    9. Shanfeng Wu & Wenbo Mo & Runlei Zhang & Xuan Xiao & E Li & Xi Liu & Nan Yang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Mechanism of Production–Living–Ecological Space from 1990 to 2020 in Hunan, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Nuria Novas & Alfredo Alcayde & Isabel Robalo & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro & Francisco G. Montoya, 2020. "Energies and Its Worldwide Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-41, December.
    11. Jun Luo & Xuebing Zhang & Peiji Shi, 2022. "Land Use Multi-Functionality and Zoning Governance Strategy of Densely Populated Areas in the Upper Reaches of the Yellow River: A Case Study of the Lanzhou–Xining Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Mercedes Jiménez-García & José Ruiz-Chico & Antonio Rafael Peña-Sánchez, 2020. "Landscape and Tourism: Evolution of Research Topics," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Weisong Li & Yi Zeng & Yelin Peng & Wanxu Chen & Ying Dong & Ziyan Ye & Yan Chen, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Mechanisms of the Global Production-Living-Ecological Space Coupling Coordination Degree," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Fengqiang Wu & Caijian Mo & Xiaojun Dai & Hongmei Li, 2022. "Spatial Analysis of Cultivated Land Productivity, Site Condition and Cultivated Land Health at County Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Maciej J. Nowak & Agnieszka Brelik & Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel & Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka & Justyna Przedańska, 2023. "Spatial Conflicts concerning Wind Power Plants—A Case Study of Spatial Plans in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Maciej J. Nowak & Renato Monteiro & Jorge Olcina-Cantos & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2023. "Spatial Planning Response to the Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation: An Analysis of Selected Instruments and Good Practices in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    17. Yuqing Zhang & Chengcheng Zhan & Hui Wang & Ya Gao, 2022. "Evolution and reconstruction of settlement space in tourist islands: a case study of Dachangshan Island, Changhai County," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 9777-9808, August.
    18. Yuanzhi Guo & Wenyue Zhong, 2023. "Rural Transformation Development and Its Influencing Factors in China’s Poverty-Stricken Areas: A Case Study of Yanshan-Taihang Mountains," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Hsin-Hua Tsai & Huan-Sheng Tseng & Chun-Kai Huang & Su-Chun Yu, 2022. "Review on the Conflicts between Offshore Wind Power and Fishery Rights: Marine Spatial Planning in Taiwan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Meitolo Hulu, 2023. "Batam City Coastal Tourism Management: Economic Opportunities for Micro Small and Medium Enterprises in Tourism ," GATR Journals jber235, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10452-:d:1532219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.