IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6724-d1450933.html

Understanding the Growth of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Research through Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim Delen

    (Mathematics and Science Education Department, University of Usak, 64200 Usak, Türkiye)

  • Nihal Sen

    (Institute of Educational Sciences, Special Education, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, 14030 Bolu, Türkiye)

  • Fatma Ozudogru

    (Educational Sciences Department, University of Usak, 64200 Usak, Türkiye)

  • Michele Biasutti

    (Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, 35139 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate research trends in artificial intelligence studies related to education that were published in the Web of Science database. This review conducted a bibliometric analysis of 4673 articles published between 1975 and 2023 and explored trends in several areas, including the annual distribution of publications, frequently studied topics, top authors, top countries, top universities/departments, top journals and publishers, and top funders. The findings highlighted that the number of studies increased exponentially after 2010. The most often used terms in artificial intelligence research in education were machine learning, deep learning, and data mining. Studies in higher education have been more prevalent than studies in elementary and secondary education. The USA, mainland China, and Australia were the three most productive nations. Most productive authors were connected to academic institutions in Taiwan, Hong Kong, or mainland China. Furthermore, there was little cooperation among the most productive authors andcountries. In addition to the abundance of journals on educational technology, it is crucial to emphasize the dearth of publications on education across different disciplines. To understand how artificial intelligence can support new practices in educational research, interdisciplinary interest and support are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim Delen & Nihal Sen & Fatma Ozudogru & Michele Biasutti, 2024. "Understanding the Growth of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Research through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6724-:d:1450933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6724/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6724/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Tomaszewski, 2023. "Visibility, impact, and applications of bibliometric software tools through citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 4007-4028, July.
    2. Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero & Jesús López-Belmonte & José-Antonio Marín-Marín & Rebeca Soler-Costa, 2020. "Scientific Development of Educational Artificial Intelligence in Web of Science," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Mila Cascajares & Alfredo Alcayde & Esther Salmerón-Manzano & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2021. "The Bibliometric Literature on Scopus and WoS: The Medicine and Environmental Sciences Categories as Case of Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-31, May.
    4. Glenn S. McGuigan & Göktuğ Morçöl & Travis Grosser, 2023. "A social network analysis of academic journals in public administration in the early twenty-first century: examining journal level bibliometrics with network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(12), pages 6561-6588, December.
    5. Manav Raj & Robert Seamans, 2019. "Primer on artificial intelligence and robotics," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Fang Liu, 2023. "Retrieval strategy and possible explanations for the abnormal growth of research publications: re-evaluating a bibliometric analysis of climate change," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 853-859, January.
    7. Weishu Liu & Li Tang & Guangyuan Hu, 2020. "Funding information in Web of Science: an updated overview," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1509-1524, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emilio López & Maria de Fátima Oliveira & Pedro Reis, 2025. "The Use of Circular Economy in Horticulture Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ran Ge & Yu Xia & Liquan Ge & Fei Li, 2025. "Knowledge Graph Analysis in Climate Action Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Irina-Daniela Cișmașu & Bianca Raluca Cibu & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Camelia Delcea, 2025. "The Persistence Puzzle: Bibliometric Insights into Dropout in MOOCs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-42, March.
    3. Shuya Tang & Chunhui Wang & Jing Song & Stanley Chukwuemeka Ihenetu & Gang Li, 2024. "Advances in Studies on Heavy Metals in Urban Soil: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Maria Alexandra Crăciun & Adrian Domenteanu & Monica Dudian & Camelia Delcea, 2025. "Navigating Sustainability: A Bibliometric Exploration of Environmental Decision-Making and Behavioral Shifts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-48, March.
    5. Ciurea Iulia-Cristina, 2024. "The Impact of the EU AI Act on the UN Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 – A Text Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2857-2870.
    6. Corsini, Alberto & Pezzoni, Michele, 2023. "Does grant funding foster research impact? Evidence from France," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    7. Xiaolin Deng & Xiangtao Wang & Yuting Yang & Junqin Li & Yang Gao & Haiyan Huang & Yu Zhang & Jing Du & Puchang Wang, 2025. "Global Research Trends and Hotspots in White Clover ( Trifolium repens L.) Responses to Drought Stress (1990–2024)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Lin Zhang & Wenjing Zhao & Beibei Sun & Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2020. "How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: a global analysis of response patterns," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 747-773, July.
    9. Hui Li & Weishu Liu, 2020. "Same same but different: self-citations identified through Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2723-2732, September.
    10. Li Tang & Jennifer Kuzma & Xi Zhang & Xinyu Song & Yin Li & Hongxu Liu & Guangyuan Hu, 2023. "Synthetic biology and governance research in China: a 40-year evolution," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(9), pages 5293-5310, September.
    11. Weishu Liu & Meiting Huang & Haifeng Wang, 2021. "Same journal but different numbers of published records indexed in Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection: causes, consequences, and solutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4541-4550, May.
    12. Alexandra Nicoleta Ciucu-Durnoi & Camelia Delcea & Aurelia Stănescu & Cosmin Alexandru Teodorescu & Vanesa Mădălina Vargas, 2024. "Beyond Industry 4.0: Tracing the Path to Industry 5.0 through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Phanish Puranam, 2021. "Human–AI collaborative decision-making as an organization design problem," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 10(2), pages 75-80, June.
    14. Alisha Ralph & Akarsh Arora, 2024. "Mapping the literature on decent work: A bibliometric analysis of sustainable development goal 8," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3937-3952, August.
    15. Adina-Iuliana Jigani & Camelia Delcea & Margareta-Stela Florescu & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas, 2024. "Tracking Happiness in Times of COVID-19: A Bibliometric Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-35, June.
    16. Shanwu Tian & Xiurui Xu & Ping Li, 2021. "Acknowledgement network and citation count: the moderating role of collaboration network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7837-7857, September.
    17. Bouchra Al MAWLA & George M. El KAZZI & Hiba S. OTHMAN, 2025. "Artificial intelligence as a disruptive force in economics: transformations, challenges, and future prospects," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(643), S), pages 87-106, Summer.
    18. Ou, Guiyan & Zhao, Kang & Zuo, Renxian & Wu, Jiang, 2024. "Effects of research funding on the academic impact and societal visibility of scientific research," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    19. Cirillo, Valeria & Mina, Andrea & Ricci, Andrea, 2024. "Digital technologies, labor market flows and training: Evidence from Italian employer-employee data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    20. Qianqian Jin & Hongshu Chen & Ximeng Wang & Tingting Ma & Fei Xiong, 2022. "Exploring funding patterns with word embedding-enhanced organization–topic networks: a case study on big data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5415-5440, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6724-:d:1450933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.