IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5540-d1424873.html

Digital Service Quality Measurement Model Proposal and Prototype Development

Author

Listed:
  • Erhan Sur

    (Department of Computer Tecnologies, Gerze Vocational School, Sinop University, Sinop TR57600, Türkiye)

  • Hüseyin Çakır

    (Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education, Gazi Faculty of Education, Gazi University, Ankara TR06500, Türkiye
    Digital Economy Research Center, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), Baku AZ1001, Azerbaijan)

Abstract

Traditional service quality models, which are survey-based methods, have been noted by researchers to contain operational errors in their application. Researchers criticize service quality models such as SERVQUAL and SERVPERF for containing operational errors, high implementation costs, and the issue of response recall. Additionally, these models face difficulties when applied to different sectors, as they were developed for the retail industry. The adaptation of the model, data collection, and processing have become outdated in comparison to current information processing technologies. With the rise in the use of social media, new communication paradigms have emerged. In this new paradigm, direct communication is established between people and institutions through social media. Institutions analyze social media data using text mining and sentiment analysis methods to keep up with this change. There are studies in the literature proposing new methods for measuring service quality by separately using text mining and sentiment analysis techniques. In this study, these two techniques have been combined. It is believed that combining these two techniques will result in a more robust service quality measurement model. Additionally, an application has been developed to demonstrate the functionality of the model. A municipality was specifically chosen as the application area because social media allows for fast, efficient, and inclusive participation between citizens and the municipality. The proposed model will enable the better identification of service quality deficiencies, leading to a more efficient use of municipal resources and fostering a more sustainable understanding of the municipality. With the implementation of the model, 463,886 tweets sent to the @ankarabbld and @mavimasa accounts were analyzed to identify 10 service quality dimensions and 106 keywords representing these dimensions, which would reveal the municipality’s service quality. The sentiment analysis technique was applied to 187,084 tweets containing the identified keywords. Thus, an attempt was made to uncover the municipality’s service quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Erhan Sur & Hüseyin Çakır, 2024. "Digital Service Quality Measurement Model Proposal and Prototype Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-33, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5540-:d:1424873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5540/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5540/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Osama Harfoushi & Dana Hasan & Ruba Obiedat, 2018. "Sentiment Analysis Algorithms through Azure Machine Learning: Analysis and Comparison," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 1-49, July.
    2. Steve Jones & Gordon W. Paynter, 2002. "Automatic extraction of document keyphrases for use in digital libraries: Evaluation and applications," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(8), pages 653-677.
    3. Ryo Kohsaka & Hikaru Matsuoka, 2015. "Analysis of Japanese Municipalities With Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS Certification," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandar Valjarević & Jasmina Petrović & Olivera Marković-Savić & Dejan Filipović & Dušan Ristić & Dragan Radovanović & Marijana Azdejković, 2020. "Roma Inner Migration Tradition Between Social Inclusion and the Protection of Natural Resources," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    2. Diana Harding & Kevin Muhamad Lukman & Matheus Jingga & Yuta Uchiyama & Jay Mar D. Quevedo & Ryo Kohsaka, 2022. "Urban Gardening and Wellbeing in Pandemic Era: Preliminary Results from a Socio-Environmental Factors Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Jay Mar D. Quevedo & Yuta Uchiyama & Kevin Muhamad Lukman & Ryo Kohsaka, 2020. "How Blue Carbon Ecosystems Are Perceived by Local Communities in the Coral Triangle: Comparative and Empirical Examinations in the Philippines and Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Dmitry Erokhin & Nadejda Komendantova, 2024. "Earthquake conspiracy discussion on Twitter," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Huiqi Song & Pengwei Chen & Yongxun Zhang & Youcheng Chen, 2021. "Study Progress of Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS): A Literature Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Schwab Bakombo & Paulette Ewalefo & Anne T. M. Konkle, 2023. "The Influence of Social Media on the Perception of Autism Spectrum Disorders: Content Analysis of Public Discourse on YouTube Videos," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Munan Li, 2018. "Classifying and ranking topic terms based on a novel approach: role differentiation of author keywords," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 77-100, July.
    8. Hongbing Jiang & Chen Yang & Jian Ma & Thushari Silva & Huaping Chen, 2016. "A social voting approach for scientific domain vocabularies construction," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(2), pages 803-820, August.
    9. Guannan Zhu & Xiande Li & Yongxun Zhang, 2021. "Multi-Stakeholder Involvement Mechanism in Tourism Management for Maintaining Terraced Landscape in Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS) Sites: A Case Study of Dazhai Village in Longji Terraces, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Yoshitaka Miyake & Shota Kimoto & Yuta Uchiyama & Ryo Kohsaka, 2022. "Income Change and Inter-Farmer Relations through Conservation Agriculture in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan: Empirical Analysis of Economic and Behavioral Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Sheryl Rose C. Reyes & Aya Miyazaki & Evonne Yiu & Osamu Saito, 2020. "Enhancing Sustainability in Traditional Agriculture: Indicators for Monitoring the Conservation of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-28, July.
    12. Ryo Kohsaka & Yuta Uchiyama, 2021. "Special Issue: “Urban Agriculture, Forestry and Green-Blue Infrastructure as “Re-Discovered Commons”: Bridging Urban-Rural Interface”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-5, May.
    13. Wenjun Jiao & Zhounan Yu & Yehong Sun & Yang Liu, 2023. "An Analytical Framework for Formulating Conservation and Development Measures for Important Agricultural Heritage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5540-:d:1424873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.