IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5363-d1421007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Bibliometric Analysis to Experimental Validation: Bibliometric and Literature Review of Four Cementing Agents in Soil Stabilization with Experimental Focus on Xanthan Gum

Author

Listed:
  • Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino

    (Civil Engineering Program, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias 130015, Colombia)

  • Oriana Palma Calabokis

    (Faculty of Engineering and Basic Sciences, Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores, Bogotá 110231, Colombia)

  • Manuel Saba

    (Civil Engineering Program, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias 130015, Colombia)

Abstract

This article focuses on the search for efficient solutions to enhance the mechanical strength of geomaterials, especially soils, with crucial applications in civil engineering. Four promising materials are explored as soil improvement agents: natural latex (rubber trees), lignosulfonate (paper industry byproduct), xanthan gum (bacterial fermentation), and eggshell lime. While other sustainable options exist, these four were chosen for their distinct characteristics and potential for further study. Natural latex, derived from rubber trees, demonstrates exceptional potential for strengthening the mechanical resistance of soils, offering a path to effective stabilization without compromising environmental sustainability. Lignosulfonate, a paper industry byproduct, emerges as an alternative that can significantly enhance the load-bearing capacity of soils, boosting its applicability in civil engineering projects. Xanthan gum, produced through bacterial fermentation, possesses unique properties that increase soil cohesion and strength, making it a valuable option for geotechnical applications. Finally, despite potential challenges, eggshell lime shows promising potential in enhancing the mechanical resistance of soils. This study highlights the importance of evaluating and comparing these agents in terms of their effectiveness in improving the mechanical strength of soils in civil engineering applications. In the literature review, the impact of stabilizer addition (%) was examined for the four cementing agents studied, along with its influence on key soil properties like optimum moisture content (OMC, %), maximum dry density (MDD, gm/cc), California bearing ratio (CBR, %), uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) at 28 days (MPa), and the change in UCS (ΔUCS, %) among other physicochemical parameters. Appropriate selection of these materials can lead to developing more robust and sustainable geomaterials, promoting significant advancements in geotechnical engineering and civil construction practices. To evaluate their effectiveness, the efficiency of one of them was assessed experimentally. Xanthan gum (XG) was selected to biopolymerize clay soil. Specimens were prepared for strength and stiffness tests, including unconfined compression, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and ultrasonic wave analysis. The impact of stabilizer concentration was examined (e.g., 1%, 3%, 5% xanthan gum) to assess how dosage affects the soil–stabilizer mixture. The results showed that the rubber increases the unconfined compression and stiffness of the soil, controlled by the XG’s porosity/volumetric quantity ratio. The research demonstrates the potential of XG, but a broader analysis of all four materials with the outlined testing methods paves the way for future advancements in geotechnical engineering.

Suggested Citation

  • Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino & Oriana Palma Calabokis & Manuel Saba, 2024. "From Bibliometric Analysis to Experimental Validation: Bibliometric and Literature Review of Four Cementing Agents in Soil Stabilization with Experimental Focus on Xanthan Gum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-36, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5363-:d:1421007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5363-:d:1421007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.