IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4316-d1398294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Suitability Evaluation of Chinese Pearleaf Crabapples in Horqin Right Wing Front Banner Based on GIS

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaozhen Lan

    (School of Energy and Transportation Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Jixuan Wang

    (School of Energy and Transportation Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Zhiyong Pei

    (School of Energy and Transportation Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Ying Li

    (School of Energy and Transportation Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Brian K. Via

    (Forest Products Development Center, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA)

  • Xinkai Peng

    (School of Energy and Transportation Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Yicheng Ma

    (School of Energy and Transportation Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China)

Abstract

The Chinese pearleaf crabapple tree, belonging to the Rosaceae family and with the scientific name Malus asiatica , bears fruits that serve as both food and medicine. The Horqin Right Wing Front Banner is a critical node for ecological security in the northern border regions of China, exerting significant influence on ecological health in China. Additionally, the resources in this region are limited, and residents have historically relied solely on maize cultivation for sustenance. Therefore, local measures combining ecological conservation and economic development have been implemented in vigorously promoting the Chinese pearleaf crabapple industry. Hence, it is necessary to study the ecological suitability of the local Chinese pearleaf crabapple. In this study, 15 evaluation indicators are employed for this purpose, with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) used to calculate single-factor weights. Additionally, GIS is utilized to establish membership functions for achieving dimensionless evaluation indicators, as well as a weighted index and model used to compute comprehensive suitability scores. Using the natural breakpoint method, the overall scores were categorized into five groups: most suitable, more suitable, barely suitable, unsuitable, and not applicable. The validation of zoning results includes verification of existing planting locations and conducting principal component analysis of the characteristics and yield of Chinese pearleaf crabapple to ensure the accuracy of the zoning. It is found that the validation results are generally consistent with the zoning results. The results indicate that the most suitable, more suitable, suitable, barely suitable, and unsuitable represent 16.49%, 32.07%, 30.36%, 14.52%, and 6.55% of the total zoning area, respectively. These findings can be applied to land use planning and in expanding the planting area of Chinese pearleaf crabapple.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaozhen Lan & Jixuan Wang & Zhiyong Pei & Ying Li & Brian K. Via & Xinkai Peng & Yicheng Ma, 2024. "Ecological Suitability Evaluation of Chinese Pearleaf Crabapples in Horqin Right Wing Front Banner Based on GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4316-:d:1398294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4316/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4316/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4316-:d:1398294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.