IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p195-d1307219.html

Indicator Method as a Way of Analyzing the Level of Implementation of the Objectives of Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Andrzej Pacana

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Karolina Czerwińska

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Lucia Bednárová

    (Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 9, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Rastislav Petrovský

    (Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 9, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to propose a combination of methods as part of the analysis of progress in the context of the achievement of one of the Sustainable Development Goals (Goal 12: responsible consumption and production) by Poland and Slovakia using sustainable development indicators. The method used was diagnostic survey, comparative analysis, and within the framework of data collection, the techniques of content analysis and desk research, which were integrally combined in the research procedure. The implementation of the analysis indicated that surveillance using sustainable development indicators is associated with difficulties (for example, gaps in the availability of standardized data and difficult access to adequate data) and generalizations and subjectivity. This analysis showed that the countries are successively striving to meet the provisions that are related to Goal 12. Estimates of the degree of achievement of the goal are adequate for the duration of the goal. Priority activities of the countries should focus on increasing the level of development of ecological agriculture, striving to increase the efficiency of use of available resources, changing the approach to available resources (moving away from linear development), and changing consumption patterns (increased development of a closed-loop economy). Future research areas will focus on analyzing the level of implications of the goals of Agenda 2030 in Poland and Slovakia and developing developmental forecasts for both countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrzej Pacana & Karolina Czerwińska & Lucia Bednárová & Rastislav Petrovský, 2023. "Indicator Method as a Way of Analyzing the Level of Implementation of the Objectives of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:195-:d:1307219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adesuwa Vanessa Agbedahin, 2019. "Sustainable development, Education for Sustainable Development, and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 669-680, July.
    2. Oleg Rybalkin & Olga Lavrinenko & Alina Danileviča & Wiesława Lizińska, 2023. "Sustainable Development Green Index: measuring progress towards sustainable development goals in the European Union," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 10(4), pages 279-292, June.
    3. Ismael Moya‐Clemente & Gabriela Ribes‐Giner & Odette Pantoja‐Díaz, 2020. "Configurations of sustainable development goals that promote sustainable entrepreneurship over time," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 572-584, July.
    4. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Aleksandra Płonka & Mariusz Dacko & Łukasz Satoła & Aneta Dacko, 2022. "The Idea of Sustainable Development and the Possibilities of Its Interpretation and Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zijian Zhang & Yinghao Lin & Xiaoyuan Wang & Xin Zhang, 2024. "Pathways to Resilient and Sustainable Online Education in the New Normal: Interpreting University Teachers’ Willingness to Use Online Teaching Platforms Consistently," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Qu, Hongjiao & Wang, Weiyin & Feng, Chen-Chieh & Guo, Luo, 2026. "The new perspective of future multi-scenario analysis: Decoding impact pathways of land use dynamics on sustainable development goals," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Athanasios Papavasileiou & George Konteos & Stavros Kalogiannidis & Dimitrios Kalfas & Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou, 2025. "Investigating the Impact of Sustainability-Themed Extracurricular Activities on Student Engagement with the 17 SDGs by 2026: A Case Study of Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Walter Leal Filho & David Anthony Kirby & Tiago F. A. C. Sigahi & Ricardo L. F. Bella & Rosley Anholon & Osvaldo L. G. Quelhas, 2025. "Higher education and sustainable entrepreneurship: The state of the art and a look to the future," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 957-969, February.
    5. Mário Santos & Helena Moreira & João Alexandre Cabral & Ronaldo Gabriel & Andreia Teixeira & Rita Bastos & Alfredo Aires, 2022. "Contribution of Home Gardens to Sustainable Development: Perspectives from A Supported Opinion Essay," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Lavinia Dovleac & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Eliza Nichifor & Gabriel Brătucu, 2023. "Shaping the Inclusivity in the New Society by Enhancing the Digitainability of Sustainable Development Goals with Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Guta Regasa Megerssa & Weyessa Garedew & Adugna Eneyew Bekele & Janina Grabs & Kristjan Jespersen, 2025. "How Do Institutions Shape the Resilience of the Ethiopian Coffee Sector Amidst the Pressures of Climate Change?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 7951-7973, December.
    8. Diego Bonilla-Jurado & Ember Zumba & Araceli Lucio-Quintana & Carlos Yerbabuena-Torres & Andrea Ramírez-Casco & Cesar Guevara, 2024. "Advancing University Education: Exploring the Benefits of Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Tadeusz Olejarz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Method of Qualitative–Environmental Choice of Devices Converting Green Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Hiroko Oe & Yasuyuki Yamaoka & Hiroko Ochiai, 2022. "A Qualitative Assessment of Community Learning Initiatives for Environmental Awareness and Behaviour Change: Applying UNESCO Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Samantha Tshabalala & Wilfred Lunga & Caiphus Baloyi, 2025. "Climate Change Education: Preparing African Youth for Future Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Sheng-Wei Lin & Huai-Wei Lo, 2024. "An FMEA model for risk assessment of university sustainability: using a combined ITARA with TOPSIS-AL approach based neutrosophic sets," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 2119-2145, November.
    13. Pramod Kumar Sharma, 2025. "Galvanizing Education for Sustainable Development Practice Through the Greening Education Partnership: Steering Green Schools Towards 2030 and Beyond," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 19(2), pages 189-202, September.
    14. Md. Kamal Uddin, 2024. "Environmental education for sustainable development in Bangladesh and its challenges," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1137-1151, February.
    15. Rūtenis Jančius & Algirdas Gavenauskas & Antanas Ūsas, 2021. "The Influence of Values and the Social Environment on the Environmental Attitudes of Students: The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    16. SĂLCUDEAN Minodora & PINTEA Adina & SĂVESCU Roxana, 2023. "Connecting Sustainable Development With Media, Journalism And Communication Programs In European Universities," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 18(2), pages 290-302, August.
    17. Figen Çam‐Tosun & Sibel Söğüt, 2024. "Development and validation of a sustainable education scale," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 4082-4096, August.
    18. Beatriz Martín Bautista-Cerro & Anabel Castillo-Rodríguez & Justo García-Navarro, 2023. "Contribution of European University Alliances to Education for Sustainable Development and to the SDGs: A Case Study on the Circular EELISA Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    19. S. Chinju Chandran & S. Rajitha Kumar, 2024. "Industrial cooperatives: A sustainable business model for promoting social entrepreneurship," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Benedikt Heuckmann & Albert Zeyer, 2022. "Science|Environment|Health, One Health, Planetary Health, Sustainability, and Education for Sustainable Development: How Do They Connect in Health Teaching?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:195-:d:1307219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.