IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5180-d1097531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Cultural Differences in Driving Styles: A Moderated Mediation Analysis Linking Forgivingness, Emotion Regulation Difficulties, and Driving Styles

Author

Listed:
  • Berfin Töre

    (Psychological Counseling and Guidance Unit, Eskisehir Technical University, Eskisehir 26555, Turkey)

  • Meital Navon-Eyal

    (The Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290001, Israel)

  • Orit Taubman – Ben-Ari

    (The Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290001, Israel)

Abstract

Although various factors contributing to driving styles have been studied in recent decades, cultural differences have received little attention. Both emotion regulation difficulties and trait forgivingness have been found to be associated with driving styles, but the role of culture in these associations has not been yet explored. The current study seeks to understand the mediating role of emotion regulation difficulties in the association between trait forgivingness and driving styles and whether this relationship differs in different cultures. To this end, a moderated mediation model was developed and tested among 823 drivers from Israel ( n = 287), Turkey ( n = 329), and the USA ( n = 207). The participants completed the Forgivingness Scale, Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (MDSI), Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, and background details. The moderated mediation analysis was conducted using model 59 in the PROCESS macro developed by Hayes and Preacher (2013). The results show significant differences in all driving styles between the study groups. In addition, the mediation model for the angry and hostile and the reckless and careless driving styles was found to apply only to certain countries. The study highlights cultural differences and their importance in understanding the association between emotional processes and driving styles and the need to design culturally sensitive interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Berfin Töre & Meital Navon-Eyal & Orit Taubman – Ben-Ari, 2023. "Cross-Cultural Differences in Driving Styles: A Moderated Mediation Analysis Linking Forgivingness, Emotion Regulation Difficulties, and Driving Styles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5180-:d:1097531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian C. Fischer & Ekin Secinti & Zeynep Cemalcilar & Kevin L. Rand, 2021. "Examining Cross-Cultural Relationships Between Meaning in Life and Psychological Well-Being in Turkey and the United States," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1341-1358, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chih Nuo Grace Chao & Alan Chi-Keung Cheung & Elaine Lau & Angel Nga Man Leung, 2023. "Teachers’ Perceptions on Quality of School Leadership and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Roles of Work-Related Meaning in Life and Optimism in Hong Kong Kindergarten Teachers," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 1249-1268, June.
    2. Li, Sijia & Luo, Hao & Huang, Feng & Wang, Yiming & Siu Fai Yip, Paul, 2024. "Associations between meaning in life and suicidal ideation in young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Agnieszka Lasota & Justyna Mróz, 2021. "Positive Psychology in Times of Pandemic—Time Perspective as a Moderator of the Relationship between Resilience and Meaning in Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5180-:d:1097531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.