IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2499-d1051750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combination of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms and Machine Learning Methods for Groundwater Potential Mapping

Author

Listed:
  • Saad AlAyyash

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq 25113, Jordan)

  • A’kif Al-Fugara

    (Department of Surveying Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq 25113, Jordan)

  • Rania Shatnawi

    (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Built Environment Engineering, Al-Hussein Technical University, Amman 11822, Jordan)

  • Abdel Rahman Al-Shabeeb

    (Department of Geographic Information Systems & Remote Sensing, Faculty of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq 25113, Jordan)

  • Rida Al-Adamat

    (Department of Geographic Information Systems & Remote Sensing, Faculty of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq 25113, Jordan)

  • Hani Al-Amoush

    (Department of Applied Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq 25113, Jordan)

Abstract

The groundwater contained in aquifers is among the most important water supply resources, especially in semi-arid and arid regions worldwide. This study aims to evaluate and compare the prediction capability of two well–known models, support vector machine (SVM) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), combined with a genetic algorithm (GA), invasive weed optimization (IWO), and teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithms in groundwater potential mapping (GPM) the Azraq Basin in Jordan. The hybridization of the SVM and ANFIS models with the GA, IWO, and TLBO algorithms results in six models: SVM–GA, SVM–IWO, SVM–TLBO, ANFIS–GA, ANFIS–IWO, and ANFIS–TLBO. A database consisting of well data containing 464 wells with 12 predictive factors was developed for the groundwater potential mapping (GPM) of the study area. Of the 464 well locations, 70% (325 locations) were assigned for the training set and the rest (139 locations) for the validation set. The correlation between the 12 predictive factors and the well locations is analyzed using the frequency ratio (FR) statistical model. An area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was used to evaluate and compare the models. According to the results, the SVM-based hybrid models outperformed other ANFIS hybrid models in the learning (training) and validation phases. The SVM–GA and SVM–TLBO hybrid models showed AUROC values of 0.984 and 0.971, respectively, in the training and validation phases. Moreover, the ANFIS–GA and ANFIS–TLBO hybrid models showed an AUROC of 0.979 and 0.984 in the training phase and an AUROC of 0.973 and 0.984 in the validation phase, respectively. The SVM–IWO and ANFIS–IWO hybrid models showed the lowest AUROC. This study demonstrated the more efficient results of the SVM-based hybrid models in comparison with the ANFIS-based hybrid models in terms of accuracy and modeling speed.

Suggested Citation

  • Saad AlAyyash & A’kif Al-Fugara & Rania Shatnawi & Abdel Rahman Al-Shabeeb & Rida Al-Adamat & Hani Al-Amoush, 2023. "Combination of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms and Machine Learning Methods for Groundwater Potential Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2499-:d:1051750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2499/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2499/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huajie Duan & Zhengdong Deng & Feifan Deng & Daqing Wang, 2016. "Assessment of Groundwater Potential Based on Multicriteria Decision Making Model and Decision Tree Algorithms," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-11, December.
    2. Vahid Moosavi & Mehdi Vafakhah & Bagher Shirmohammadi & Negin Behnia, 2013. "A Wavelet-ANFIS Hybrid Model for Groundwater Level Forecasting for Different Prediction Periods," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(5), pages 1301-1321, March.
    3. Tarun Kumar & Amar Gautam & Tinu Kumar, 2014. "Appraising the accuracy of GIS-based Multi-criteria decision making technique for delineation of Groundwater potential zones," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(13), pages 4449-4466, October.
    4. Samad Emamgholizadeh & Khadije Moslemi & Gholamhosein Karami, 2014. "Prediction the Groundwater Level of Bastam Plain (Iran) by Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(15), pages 5433-5446, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xianming Dou & Yongguo Yang & Jinhui Luo, 2018. "Estimating Forest Carbon Fluxes Using Machine Learning Techniques Based on Eddy Covariance Measurements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Dilip Kumar Roy & Sujit Kumar Biswas & Kowshik Kumar Saha & Khandakar Faisal Ibn Murad, 2021. "Groundwater Level Forecast Via a Discrete Space-State Modelling Approach as a Surrogate to Complex Groundwater Simulation Modelling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(6), pages 1653-1672, April.
    3. Akram Seifi & Mohammad Ehteram & Vijay P. Singh & Amir Mosavi, 2020. "Modeling and Uncertainty Analysis of Groundwater Level Using Six Evolutionary Optimization Algorithms Hybridized with ANFIS, SVM, and ANN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-42, May.
    4. Haijiao Yu & Xiaohu Wen & Qi Feng & Ravinesh C. Deo & Jianhua Si & Min Wu, 2018. "Comparative Study of Hybrid-Wavelet Artificial Intelligence Models for Monthly Groundwater Depth Forecasting in Extreme Arid Regions, Northwest China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(1), pages 301-323, January.
    5. Maryam Shafaei & Ozgur Kisi, 2016. "Lake Level Forecasting Using Wavelet-SVR, Wavelet-ANFIS and Wavelet-ARMA Conjunction Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 79-97, January.
    6. Akshita Bassi & Aditya Manchanda & Rajwinder Singh & Mahesh Patel, 2023. "A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of compressive strength of rice husk ash-based concrete," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(1), pages 209-238, August.
    7. Chih-Chiang Wei & Nien-Sheng Hsu & Chien-Lin Huang, 2014. "Two-Stage Pumping Control Model for Flood Mitigation in Inundated Urban Drainage Basins," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(2), pages 425-444, January.
    8. Vinit Sehgal & Rajeev Sahay & Chandranath Chatterjee, 2014. "Effect of Utilization of Discrete Wavelet Components on Flood Forecasting Performance of Wavelet Based ANFIS Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(6), pages 1733-1749, April.
    9. Mohammad Naderianfar & Jamshid Piri & Ozgur Kisi, 2017. "Pre-processing data to predict groundwater levels using the fuzzy standardized evapotranspiration and precipitation index (SEPI)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(14), pages 4433-4448, November.
    10. Sandra M. Guzman & Joel O. Paz & Mary Love M. Tagert, 2017. "The Use of NARX Neural Networks to Forecast Daily Groundwater Levels," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(5), pages 1591-1603, March.
    11. Kostić, Srđan & Stojković, Milan & Guranov, Iva & Vasović, Nebojša, 2019. "Revealing the background of groundwater level dynamics: Contributing factors, complex modeling and engineering applications," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 408-421.
    12. Muhammad Shoaib & Asaad Y. Shamseldin & Sher Khan & Mudasser Muneer Khan & Zahid Mahmood Khan & Tahir Sultan & Bruce W. Melville, 2018. "A Comparative Study of Various Hybrid Wavelet Feedforward Neural Network Models for Runoff Forecasting," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(1), pages 83-103, January.
    13. S. Mohanty & Madan Jha & S. Raul & R. Panda & K. Sudheer, 2015. "Using Artificial Neural Network Approach for Simultaneous Forecasting of Weekly Groundwater Levels at Multiple Sites," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(15), pages 5521-5532, December.
    14. A. Alvarado & M. Esteller & E. Quentin & J. Expósito, 2016. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and GIS Approach for Prioritization of Drinking Water Utilities Protection Based on their Vulnerability to Contamination," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1549-1566, March.
    15. Gokmen Tayfur & Ata Nadiri & Asghar Moghaddam, 2014. "Supervised Intelligent Committee Machine Method for Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(4), pages 1173-1184, March.
    16. Sajjad Abdollahi & Jalil Raeisi & Mohammadreza Khalilianpour & Farshad Ahmadi & Ozgur Kisi, 2017. "Daily Mean Streamflow Prediction in Perennial and Non-Perennial Rivers Using Four Data Driven Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(15), pages 4855-4874, December.
    17. Bandi Aneesha Satya & Meshapam Shashi & Deva Pratap, 2019. "A geospatial approach to flash flood hazard mapping in the city of Warangal, Telangana, India," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, September.
    18. Emna Boughariou & Nabila Allouche & Fatma Ben Brahim & Ghada Nasri & Salem Bouri, 2021. "Delineation of groundwater potentials of Sfax region, Tunisia, using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and weights of evidence models," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14749-14774, October.
    19. Ting Liu & Sherong Zhang & Chao Wang, 2021. "A BIM-Based Safety Management Framework for Operation and Maintenance in Water Diversion Projects," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(5), pages 1619-1635, March.
    20. Dilip Kumar Roy & Bithin Datta, 2017. "Fuzzy C-Mean Clustering Based Inference System for Saltwater Intrusion Processes Prediction in Coastal Aquifers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(1), pages 355-376, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2499-:d:1051750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.