IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1373-d1031987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phenology Metrics for Vegetation Type Classification in Estuarine Wetlands Using Satellite Imagery

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Gao

    (School of Geography, Geomatics and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Zhaoling Hu

    (School of Geography, Geomatics and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Zhen Wang

    (Lianyungang Forestry Technical Guidance Station, Lianyungang 222000, China)

  • Qiang Shi

    (School of Geomatics and Marine Information, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222002, China)

  • Dan Chen

    (School of Geomatics and Marine Information, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222002, China)

  • Shuai Wu

    (Lianyungang Real Estate Registry, Lianyungang 222006, China)

  • Yajun Gao

    (Lianyungang Forestry Technical Guidance Station, Lianyungang 222000, China)

  • Yuanzhi Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Lunar and Deep Space Exploration, National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

While the efficiency of incorporating phenology features into vegetation type classification, in general, and coastal wetland vegetation classification, in particular, has been verified, it is difficult to acquire high-spatial-resolution (HSR) images taken at appropriate times for vegetation identification using phenology features because of the coastal climate and the HSR satellite imaging cycle. To strengthen phenology feature differences, in this study, we constructed vegetation phenology metrics according to vegetation NDVI time series curves fitted by samples collected from the Linhong Estuary Wetland and Liezi Estuary Wetland based on Gao Fen (GF) series satellite images taken between 2018 and 2022. Next, we calculated the phenology metrics using GF series satellite imagery taken over the most recent complete phenology cycle: 21 October 2020, 9 January 2021, 19 February 2021, and 8 May 2021. Five vegetation type classifications in the Linhong Estuary Wetland were carried out using single images of 21 October 2020 and 8 May 2021, along with their combination and the further addition of phenology metrics. From our comparison and analysis, the following findings emerged: Combining the images taken in 21 October 2020 and 8 May 2021 provided better vegetation classification accuracy than any single image, and the overall accuracy was, respectively, increased from 47% and 48% to 67%, while the corresponding kappa was increased from 33% and 34% to 58%; however, adding phenology metrics further improved the accuracy by decreasing the effect of some confusion among different vegetation types, and the overall accuracy and kappa were further improved to 75% and 69%, respectively. Though some problems remain to be further dealt with, this exploration offers helpful insights into coastal wetland vegetation classification using phenology based on HSR imagery.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Gao & Zhaoling Hu & Zhen Wang & Qiang Shi & Dan Chen & Shuai Wu & Yajun Gao & Yuanzhi Zhang, 2023. "Phenology Metrics for Vegetation Type Classification in Estuarine Wetlands Using Satellite Imagery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1373-:d:1031987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan Chen & Xianyun Fei & Zhen Wang & Yajun Gao & Xiaowei Shen & Tingting Han & Yuanzhi Zhang, 2022. "Classifying Vegetation Types in Mountainous Areas with Fused High Spatial Resolution Images: The Case of Huaguo Mountain, Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1373-:d:1031987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.