Author
Listed:
- Dan Chen
(School of Geomatics and Marine Information, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222002, China)
- Xianyun Fei
(School of Geomatics and Marine Information, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222002, China)
- Zhen Wang
(Lianyungang Forestry Technical Guidance Station, Lianyungang 222005, China)
- Yajun Gao
(Lianyungang Forestry Technical Guidance Station, Lianyungang 222005, China)
- Xiaowei Shen
(School of Geomatics and Marine Information, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222002, China)
- Tingting Han
(School of Geomatics and Marine Information, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222002, China)
- Yuanzhi Zhang
(Key Laboratory of Lunar and Deep Space Exploration, National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
Abstract
This study tested image fusion quality aiming at vegetation classification in the Kongquegou scenic location on the southern slope of Huaguo Mountain in Lianyungang, Jiangsu Province, China. Four fusion algorithms were used to fuse WorldView-2 multispectral and panchromatic images: GS (Gram-Schmidt) transform, Ehlers, Wavelet transform, and Modified IHS. The fusion effect was evaluated through visual comparison, quantitative index analysis, and vegetation classification accuracy. The study result revealed that GS and Wavelet transformation produced higher spectral fidelity and better-quality fusion images, followed by Modified IHS and Ehlers. In terms of vegetation classification, for the Wavelet transform, both spectral information and adding spatial structure provided higher accuracy and displayed suitability for vegetation classification in the selected area. Meanwhile, although the spectral features obtained better classification accuracy using the Modified IHS, adding spatial structure to the classification process produced less improvement and a lower robustness effect. The GS transform yielded better spectral fidelity but relatively low vegetation classification accuracy using spectral features only and combined spectral features and spatial structure. Lastly, the Ehlers method’s vegetation classification results were similar to those of the GS transform image fusion method. Additionally, the accuracy was significantly improved in the fused images compared to the multispectral image. Overall, Wavelet transforms showed the best vegetation classification results in the study area among the four fusion algorithms.
Suggested Citation
Dan Chen & Xianyun Fei & Zhen Wang & Yajun Gao & Xiaowei Shen & Tingting Han & Yuanzhi Zhang, 2022.
"Classifying Vegetation Types in Mountainous Areas with Fused High Spatial Resolution Images: The Case of Huaguo Mountain, Jiangsu, China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13390-:d:945073
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13390-:d:945073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.