IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16666-d1296354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Decision-Making Process for Hurricane Evacuation Orders: A Case Study of Florida County Emergency Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Iman

    (Department of Security Studies, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA)

  • Yue Ge

    (School of Public Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)

  • Daniel J. Klenow

    (Department of Emergency Management and Disaster Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA)

  • Amanda Savitt

    (Center for Climate Adaptation Research, Cleveland, OH 44120, USA)

  • Pamela Murray-Tuite

    (Glenn Department of Civil Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA)

Abstract

This study aims to provide a more robust understanding of the elements involved in emergency managers’ decision-making processes when issuing hurricane evacuation orders. We used the principles of the theory of bounded rationality to formulate research questions for understanding decision-making during uncertain times (i.e., hurricane evacuation orders). We then conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with county emergency managers in Florida to understand how this decision-making process unfolds. Results showed that emergency managers consider two primary factors in their decision-making process, including fixed and random factors. Fixed factors refer to elements and information that are known to emergency managers and do not change drastically from one hurricane to another (e.g., homeless population, poor housing structure). Random factors, on the other hand, refer to elements involved in hurricane decision-making that cannot be precisely predicted (e.g., storm surge). Random and fixed factors then blend in with other elements (planning, collaboration, and information assessment) during the response phase of an emergency. The interplay among these elements can ultimately influence emergency managers’ hurricane evacuation decisions. Although the existing research has made significant strides in studying many aspects of emergency managers’ decision-making processes, there have been limited discussions about the various factors that emergency managers consider for issuing hurricane evacuation orders. Our study highlights the broader implications of information interpretation, situational uncertainty, and collaboration for emergency management organizations responsible for making decisions about hurricane evacuation orders. Using the theory of bounded rationality, this study dissects both fixed and random factors influencing evacuations. In doing so, it has the potential to assist emergency managers in developing more sustainable hurricane evacuation plans in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Iman & Yue Ge & Daniel J. Klenow & Amanda Savitt & Pamela Murray-Tuite, 2023. "Understanding the Decision-Making Process for Hurricane Evacuation Orders: A Case Study of Florida County Emergency Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16666-:d:1296354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16666/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16666/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephanie Hoekstra & Burrell Montz, 2017. "Decisions under duress: factors influencing emergency management decision making during Superstorm Sandy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 453-471, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16666-:d:1296354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.