IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15850-d1278161.html

Risk Assessment of Domestic Wastewater Treatment System Based on Constructed Wetlands

Author

Listed:
  • Yvelisse Pérez

    (Área de Ciencias Básicas y Ambientales, Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo, Ave. de los Próceres 49, Santo Domingo 10602, Dominican Republic
    Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, Santo Domingo 11107, Dominican Republic)

  • Daniel García-Cortes

    (Instituto Superior de Tecnologías y Ciencias Aplicadas (InSTEC), University of Havana, Havana 10600, Cuba)

  • Antonio Torres-Valle

    (Instituto Superior de Tecnologías y Ciencias Aplicadas (InSTEC), University of Havana, Havana 10600, Cuba)

  • Ulises Jáuregui-Haza

    (Área de Ciencias Básicas y Ambientales, Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo, Ave. de los Próceres 49, Santo Domingo 10602, Dominican Republic)

Abstract

Risk assessment methods vary and have been applied to areas such as environmental, technological, and occupational safety, adapting to the complexities of the subjects under study. The objective of this work is to conduct a risk analysis of a domestic wastewater treatment system based on constructed wetlands (CW) and to evaluate actions to reduce the operational risk of the studied installation. The approach used is the three-dimensional risk matrix, which is a simplified version of the probabilistic risk evaluation method, making it more accessible and allowing for broader application. To apply the risk matrix method to a wastewater system based on CW, it was necessary to modify a risk model. This modification involved creating a process map and identifying accidental scenarios or sequences within each stage, including their initiating events, defenses, and consequences. The results enabled the identification of the most critical initiating events and defenses. Notably, human factors emerged as the primary contributors to the risk associated with wetland operation. The findings from this study can be used to enhance wetland security, including the prioritization of controls for the most critical defenses identified in this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvelisse Pérez & Daniel García-Cortes & Antonio Torres-Valle & Ulises Jáuregui-Haza, 2023. "Risk Assessment of Domestic Wastewater Treatment System Based on Constructed Wetlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15850-:d:1278161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15850/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15850/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Vymazal, 2022. "The Historical Development of Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Huma Ilyas & Eric D. van Hullebusch, 2020. "Performance Comparison of Different Constructed Wetlands Designs for the Removal of Personal Care Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Marta Jaskulak & Maksymilian Sotomski & Małgorzata Michalska & Roman Marks & Katarzyna Zorena, 2022. "The Effects of Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure on the Gulf of Gdansk (Southern Baltic Sea)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marwa M. Waly & Slobodan B. Mickovski & Craig Thomson, 2023. "Application of Circular Economy in Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Erick Arturo Betanzo-Torres & Gastón Ballut-Dajud & Graciano Aguilar-Cortés & Elizabeth Delfín-Portela & Luis Carlos Sandoval Herazo, 2025. "Plants Used in Constructed Wetlands for Aquaculture: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-31, July.
    3. Karolina Jóźwiakowska & Piotr Bugajski, 2023. "Influence of the Bed Temperature on the Operational Reliability of a Hybrid Constructed Wetland Wastewater Treatment Plant in South-Western Poland—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Izabela Konkol & Ksawery Kuligowski & Piotr Szafranowicz & Virpi Vorne & Anu Reinikainen & Nina Effelsberg & Morten Lykkegaard Christensen & Maria Svensson & Janis Zviedris & Jolanta Dvarioniene & Ada, 2024. "Review of the Seasonal Wastewater Challenges in Baltic Coastal Tourist Areas: Insights from the NURSECOAST-II Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Ismael Vera-Puerto & Hugo Valdés & Luis Laurens-Arredondo & Xaviera López-Cortés & Marco Quiroz & Carmen Hernández-Crespo & Marisol Belmonte & José Luis Campos & Miguel Martín-Monerris & Rosa Miglio &, 2024. "Educating Professionals to Develop Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) as Infrastructure for Water Pollution Control: A Course Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Sergio Aurelio Zamora-Castro & Humberto Raymundo González-Moreno & María Graciela Hernández-Orduña & Irma Zitácuaro-Contreras & José Luis Marín-Muñiz, 2025. "Environmental Assessment of a Constructed Wetland with Ornamental Vegetation for Wastewater Treatment: A Sustainable Option for Neighborhoods (The Case of Veracruz, Mexico)," World, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Alexander Marwa, 2024. "Comparative study of surface and subsurface flow constructed wetlands for treatment of gold mine waste rocks leachate water," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 10(03), July.
    8. Monali Muduli & Meena Choudharya & Sanak Ray, 2024. "A review on constructed wetlands for environmental and emerging contaminants removal from wastewater: traditional and recent developments," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30181-30220, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15850-:d:1278161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.