IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15514-d1272163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reviewing Sustainability Measurement Methods for Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Milena Serzante

    (Department of Economics Engineering, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Anastasiia Khudozhnyk

    (Department of Economics Engineering, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the most appropriate sustainable evaluation methods for enterprises. To achieve this goal, a literature review has been conducted in order to identify methods for measuring sustainability. The revealed results and further recommendations for future research on this particular topic are then summarised. This research examines various methods of assessing sustainability in enterprises, determines the most widely used techniques, and analyses previous studies on sustainability assessment. The researchers employed a comprehensive literature review methodology to identify methods for measuring sustainability in enterprises. Through a review of more than 40 thousand articles, focussing on the most relevant, this study found a clear trend toward more comprehensive and integrated approaches to measuring sustainability, emphasising the importance of taking into account economic, social, and environmental factors. This research revealed that Asia and Europe were the regions that have been most studied, with a focus on the secondary sector of enterprises. The results of this study are of significant value for measuring the sustainability of an enterprise. This study provides valuable implications, which offer optimised suggestions of the appropriate methodology for companies and academics to select the most suitable sustainability evaluation methods for companies. These results are also a valuable part of the future work of this research, whose main idea is to evaluate the impact of sustainable actions of enterprises on the level of economic development in a country or region.

Suggested Citation

  • Milena Serzante & Anastasiia Khudozhnyk, 2023. "Reviewing Sustainability Measurement Methods for Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15514-:d:1272163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15514/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15514/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduardo Ordonez-Ponce & Amelia Clarke & Adriane MacDonald, 2021. "Business contributions to the sustainable development goals through community sustainability partnerships," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(6), pages 1239-1267, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eduardo Ordonez‐Ponce, 2023. "The role of local cultural factors in the achievement of the sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1122-1134, April.
    2. Eduardo Ordonez‐Ponce & David Talbot, 2023. "Multinational enterprises' sustainability practices and focus on developing countries: Contributions and unexpected results of SDG implementation," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 201-232, March.
    3. Stawicka Ewa, 2023. "The Impact of Innovation on the Sustainable Development of Enterprises," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 370-386, December.
    4. Sarah Williams & David F. Murphy, 2023. "Learning from Each Other: UK Global Businesses, SMEs, CSR and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15514-:d:1272163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.