IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13011-d1228113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Fertilizers and Conditioners on Chromium Uptake of Maize in Chromium-Polluted Farmland

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Zheng

    (Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecology Conservation and Pollution Control of Anhui Province, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Xiaotian Zhou

    (Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecology Conservation and Pollution Control of Anhui Province, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Yuxin Gao

    (Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecology Conservation and Pollution Control of Anhui Province, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Chi Cao

    (Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecology Conservation and Pollution Control of Anhui Province, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Hanxiu Hu

    (Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecology Conservation and Pollution Control of Anhui Province, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Wenling Ye

    (Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecology Conservation and Pollution Control of Anhui Province, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Youhua Ma

    (Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecology Conservation and Pollution Control of Anhui Province, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

Abstract

Using agronomic measures to remediate heavy metal chromium (Cr) on farmland is the main measure to achieve the safe utilization of crops. This study was conducted under field trial conditions using locally formulated fertilizers (urea–ammonium phosphate–potassium chloride) as the control. Different fertilizer-type treatments such as ammonium sulfite, calcium magnesium phosphate, and diammonium phosphate were set up. Biochar and soil conditioner PX5B were chosen to compare the impacts of each to study the effects of different fertilizer types on maize yield, Cr content in each part, the bioconcentration factor, the translocation factor, and the available content of Cr in the soil. The results show that, compared with the formulated fertilizer, all treatments improved pH and soil organic matter and reduced the effective state of Cr content in the soil by 15.05% to 42.66%. The Cr content of maize grains under biochar and soil conditioner PX5B treatments were 0.80 mg·kg −1 and 0.88 mg·kg −1 with a 39.95% and 33.83% reduction, respectively, whereas the Cr content of maize grains under various fertilizer treatments was in the range of 0.82~1.32 mg·kg −1 with a 0.75%~38.19% reduction, respectively. Among the different fertilizer treatments, urea–calcium magnesium phosphate–potassium chloride, urea–diammonium phosphate–potassium chloride, ammonium sulfite–calcium magnesium phosphate–potassium chloride, and ammonium sulfite and urea–calcium magnesium phosphate–potassium chloride treatments reduced the Cr content of maize grains to within the range of the national food safety standard of China (1.0 mg·kg −1 ). The best reductions in the effective state Cr content of the soil and the Cr content of maize grains were achieved by ammonium sulfite–calcium magnesium phosphate–potassium chloride treatment, which was able to achieve similar reductions to the two conditioners. It also had a reduction effect on the Cr content of maize roots and straws, the aboveground bioconcentration factor (BCF), and the primary translocation factor (PTF). Therefore, the combination of ammonium sulfite and calcium magnesium phosphate is the best fertilizer combination to block the absorption of Cr by maize and has some implications for the fertilization of farmland under acidic soil conditions of Cr contamination.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Zheng & Xiaotian Zhou & Yuxin Gao & Chi Cao & Hanxiu Hu & Wenling Ye & Youhua Ma, 2023. "Effects of Fertilizers and Conditioners on Chromium Uptake of Maize in Chromium-Polluted Farmland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13011-:d:1228113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan Zha & Lin Zhao & Tianxin Niu & Erkui Yue & Xianbo Wang & Jiang Shi, 2023. "Multi-Target Element-Based Screening of Maize Varieties with Low Accumulation of Heavy Metals (HMs) and Metalloids: Uptake, Transport, and Health Risks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Xiaotian Zhou & Hanxiu Hu & Chunyang Ying & Jing Zheng & Fuhong Zhou & Haoyong Jiang & Youhua Ma, 2022. "Study on Chromium Uptake and Transfer of Different Maize Varieties in Chromium-Polluted Farmland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Tianen Zhang & Bing Xia & Yuanyuan Lu & Xiaoyu Zhang & Hongfeng Chen & Rongrong Ying & Shu Jin, 2022. "Assessment of the Effects of Heavy Metals in Soils after Removal by Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron with Three Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peiyi Zeng & Shujuan He & Liping He & Muqing Yang & Xian Zhu & Min Wu, 2024. "Screening of Maize Varieties with High Biomass and Low Accumulation of Pb and Cd around Lead and Zinc Smelting Enterprises: Field Experiment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Yu Nong & Xinyi Liu & Zi Peng & Liangxiang Li & Xiran Cheng & Xueli Wang & Zhengwen Li & Zhigang Li & Suli Li, 2023. "Effects of Domestic Sewage on the Photosynthesis and Chromium Migration of Coix lacryma-jobi L. in Chromium-Contaminated Constructed Wetlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13011-:d:1228113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.