IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10619-d1187686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction of Security Pattern for Historical Districts in Cultural Landscape Based on MCR Model: A Case Study of Chaozong Street, Changsha City

Author

Listed:
  • Zihan Chen

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Su Liu

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Wei Liao

    (Institute of Sustainable Heritage, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

  • Junxue Zhang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China)

Abstract

This study aimed to establish a comprehensive and sustainable approach to the conservation of historical districts through the “Cultural Landscape Security Pattern” (CLSP) theory. Deploying this theory can penetrate limitations posed by physical and social-emotional factors, enabling a resilient framework which can coordinate long-term heritage protection with urbanization in a more sustainable manner. Chaozong Street in Changsha City, China, was taken as the locus of study, which was initiated by quantitatively analyzing and evaluating the cultural landscape. The ArcGIS spatial analysis and the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model were then considered to model different levels of CLSP. It was on this basis that corresponding regulations and development strategies were then proposed. The results from the study demonstrate that implementing CLSP in historic districts can construct a protective network over the districts, which can then guide the recovery of fragmented historical built environments, as well as ensure continuity of historical consciousness and integrity. In addition, in comparison with conventional protection planning methods, this method features greater flexibility and adaptability when considering and accounting for complex spatial issues in historic districts and provides a novel approach for similar studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zihan Chen & Su Liu & Wei Liao & Junxue Zhang, 2023. "Construction of Security Pattern for Historical Districts in Cultural Landscape Based on MCR Model: A Case Study of Chaozong Street, Changsha City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10619-:d:1187686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10619/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10619/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yuan & Xiao, Longzhu & Ye, Yu & Xu, Wangtu & Law, Andrew, 2016. "Understanding tourist space at a historic site through space syntax analysis: The case of Gulangyu, China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 30-43.
    2. Li, Deng-Kui & Mei, Chang-Lin & Wang, Ning, 2019. "Tests for spatial dependence and heterogeneity in spatially autoregressive varying coefficient models with application to Boston house price analysis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tizheng Li & Xiaojuan Kang, 2022. "Variable selection of higher-order partially linear spatial autoregressive model with a diverging number of parameters," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 243-285, February.
    2. Ahmet Salih Günaydın & M. Faruk Altunkasa, 2022. "Developing the socio-spatial integration of historical city centers with spatial strategies: the case of Gaziantep," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8092-8114, June.
    3. Longlong Zhang & Jingwen Yuan & Chulsoo Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Planning and Design of Ocean City Spatial Forms Based on Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Yuanyuan Mao & Xiyuan Ren & Ling Yin & Qingying Sun & Ke Song & De Wang, 2021. "Investigating Tourists’ Willingness to Walk (WTW) to Attractions within Scenic Areas: A Case Study of Tongli Ancient Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Ningling Xie & Bin Cheng, 2023. "The Impact of Urban Expressways on the Street Space of Traditional Tibetan Villages in Kham, Taking Daofu County as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Wu, Shou-Tsung & Chen, Yeong-Shyang, 2016. "Examining eco-environmental changes at major recreational sites in Kenting National Park in Taiwan by integrating SPOT satellite images and NDVI," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 23-36.
    7. Daeyoung Jeong & Yun Eui Choi & Lilan Jin & Jinhyung Chon, 2019. "Impact of Spatial Change on Tourism by Bridge Connections between Islands: A Case Study of Ganghwa County in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Wensheng Zheng & Nanqiao Du & Xiaofang Wang, 2022. "Understanding the City-transport System of Urban Agglomeration through Improved Space Syntax Analysis," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 45(2), pages 161-187, March.
    9. Islam Shajedul & Ba Abdul, 2022. "Factors that influence tourists' satisfaction in China; evidence from selected tourist destinations in Nanjing city," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 38(1), pages 521-528, December.
    10. Kádár, Bálint & Gede, Mátyás, 2021. "Tourism flows in large-scale destination systems," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Xuefeng Ma & Jiaxin Tan & Jiekuan Zhang, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Correlation between the Tourist Hotel Industry and Town Spatial Morphology: The Case of Phoenix Ancient Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Su, Shiliang & Zhou, Hao & Xu, Mengya & Ru, Hu & Wang, Wen & Weng, Min, 2019. "Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 62-76.
    13. Peixue Liu & Xiao Xiao & Jie Zhang & Ronghua Wu & Honglei Zhang, 2018. "Spatial Configuration and Online Attention: A Space Syntax Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Domènech, Antoni & Gutiérrez, Aaron & Anton Clavé, Salvador, 2020. "Built environment and urban cruise tourists' mobility," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Angela Chantre-Astaiza & Laura Fuentes-Moraleda & Ana Muñoz-Mazón & Gustavo Ramirez-Gonzalez, 2019. "Science Mapping of Tourist Mobility 1980–2019. Technological Advancements in the Collection of the Data for Tourist Traceability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-32, August.
    16. Mateusz Tomal & Marco Helbich, 2023. "A spatial autoregressive geographically weighted quantile regression to explore housing rent determinants in Amsterdam and Warsaw," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(3), pages 579-599, March.
    17. Cheng Shi & Mengyang Liu & Yu Ye, 2021. "Measuring the Degree of Balance between Urban and Tourism Development: An Analytical Approach Using Cellular Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Tiantian Zhang & Weicheng Hua & Yannan Xu, 2019. "“Seeing” or “Being Seen”: Research on the Sight Line Design in the Lion Grove Based on Visitor Temporal–Spatial Distribution and Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-13, August.
    19. Kalaska Maciej, 2018. "The Possibilities of Using the Guidebook Analysis Method in Research on the Evolution of Urban Tourism Space in Maghreb Countries," Turyzm / Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 28(2), pages 15-21, December.
    20. Shah Jahan Miah & Huy Quan Vu & John G. Gammack, 2019. "A Location Analytics Method for the Utilisation of Geotagged Photos in Travel Marketing Decision-Making," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 1-29, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10619-:d:1187686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.