IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p9033-d1163013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of a Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant Simulated with Alternative Operational Designs

Author

Listed:
  • Dania M. Allami

    (Sanitary Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt)

  • Mohamed T. Sorour

    (Sanitary Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt)

  • Medhat Moustafa

    (Sanitary Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt)

  • Ahmed Elreedy

    (Sanitary Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt)

  • Mai Fayed

    (Sanitary Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt)

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a powerful tool to evaluate the environmental impacts of domestic wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) operations. It involves a thorough evaluation of the main characteristics or components of the environment, human health, and resources. However, the literature to date is still lacking analysis on the widely varied designs and operational conditions of full-scale WWTPs. The aim here was to integrate analyses such as LCA, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and energy consumption, when considering the environmental impacts of a full-scale WWTP, which can provide practical outputs to aid decision-making on optimum designs and operational conditions. The Russtmiya domestic WWTP, located in Iraq, was considered as the case study. Three operational alternatives were proposed as solutions to improve the WWTP’s performance, as follows: (1) conventional activated sludge with sand filter (CAS), (2) conventional activated sludge with sand filter and nitrogen removal (CAS-N), and (3) membrane bioreactor (MBR). The operation of such alternatives was investigated through modeling and simulation using GPS-X 8.0.1 software. The energy consumption of each alternative was estimated via GPS-X, while the GHG emissions were estimated using three different methods according to the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and GPS-X software. The OpenLCA software (1.10.3) was used to measure all impact categories at both the midpoint and endpoint levels using various methods. As a conclusion, comparing the three proposed alternatives indicated that: (1) the MBR alternative provided the lowest energy consumption and moderate GHG emissions, and (2) the CAS alternative provided the best environmental performance, particularly in aspects such as ozone depletion, global warming, and climate change, where the lowest GHGs emission values had the major contribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Dania M. Allami & Mohamed T. Sorour & Medhat Moustafa & Ahmed Elreedy & Mai Fayed, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant Simulated with Alternative Operational Designs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9033-:d:1163013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9033/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9033/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9033-:d:1163013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.