IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4754-d794844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Built Environment and Wellbeing—Standards, Multi-Criteria Evaluation Methods, Certifications

Author

Listed:
  • Elvira Nicolini

    (Department of Architecture, University of Palermo, 90129 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

The debate on IEQ (Indoor Environmental Quality), with a focus on the healthiness of the built environment and its possible influence on the natural environment, has been a relevant topic for a decade. This interest has expanded to the quality of building technologies, specifically their performances and environmental effects. The objectives set by the 2030 Agenda have led to overcome the idea that sustainability is only related to environment; instead, a holistic vision aimed at human health has been affirmed (objective 3). The period marked by the Covid19 emergency contributed to strengthen the need for human well-being, as the “quarantine” made us observe our living spaces, reflecting on quality that we ourselves perceive. There is the need for a transition from a “Green” approach to architecture, toward a “Human Centered” approach with a user-centered design. The paper focuses on the factors that can affect users’ well-being in their living space, by comparing the most common building environmental certifications (LEED, BREEAM) with WELL, a tool designed to verify the level of users’ health and well-being. Specifically, the objective is to verify, within these methodologies, the presence and possible weight of the indicators that define a quality living space according to the user’s perception.

Suggested Citation

  • Elvira Nicolini, 2022. "Built Environment and Wellbeing—Standards, Multi-Criteria Evaluation Methods, Certifications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4754-:d:794844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4754/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4754/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4754-:d:794844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.