IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8463-d1754336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact Assessment of Smart Daylighting Systems Using LCA and Measured Illuminance

Author

Listed:
  • Sertac Gorgulu

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering-Architecture, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15030 Burdur, Türkiye)

Abstract

Buildings account for a major share of global energy demand and emissions, prioritizing lighting for efficiency improvements. This study evaluates a daylight-assisted lighting system’s energy and environmental performance through a fully measurement-based approach. Monitored illuminance data were processed within a transparent workflow linking lighting demand to power use, electricity consumption, and life-c ycle greenhouse gas emissions. Energy demand was derived from luminaire efficacy and an illuminated area, while environmental impacts were quantified using an attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) framework consistent with ISO 14040/14044 standards. Use-phase carbon footprints were calculated with regional grid emission factors, and manufacturing, transport, and end-of-life stages were included as background conditions. The results demonstrate that the daylight-aware control strategy achieved an average electricity reduction of 17% (95% CI: 15.7–18.3%) compared to the constant baseline, with the greatest savings occurring in daylight-rich months. When translated into environmental terms, these operational reductions yielded a corresponding ~17% decrease in use-phase CO 2 emissions under a regional grid factor of 0.40 kg CO 2 /kWh. Importantly, the system’s embodied impacts were outweighed within an operational payback period of approximately 18–20 months, underscoring both environmental and economic viability. Sensitivity analyses across illuminance thresholds, luminaire efficacy, and grid emission factors confirmed the robustness of these outcomes. Overall, the study provides a reproducible methodology that directly integrates empirical daylight measurements with life-cycle assessment, clarifying the contribution of smart lighting control to sustainable building design.

Suggested Citation

  • Sertac Gorgulu, 2025. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Smart Daylighting Systems Using LCA and Measured Illuminance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8463-:d:1754336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8463/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8463/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabrizio Cumo & Elisa Pennacchia & Adriana Scarlet Sferra, 2025. "Sustainability in Public Lighting: The Methodology for Identifying Environmentally Optimal Solutions in Replacement Planning—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Roberto Cerchione & Mariarosaria Morelli & Renato Passaro & Ivana Quinto, 2025. "A critical analysis of the integration of life cycle methods and quantitative methods for sustainability assessment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 1508-1544, March.
    3. Samira Shokouhi & Ingo Weidlich, 2025. "An LCA Study of Various Office Building Shapes Focusing on Operational Energy—A Case of Hamburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Elvira Nicolini, 2022. "Built Environment and Wellbeing—Standards, Multi-Criteria Evaluation Methods, Certifications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Yao Xiong & Yiyan Sun & Yunfeng Yang, 2025. "Impact of Urban Green Space Patterns on Carbon Emissions: A Gray BP Neural Network and Geo-Detector Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-34, August.
    6. Jaekyu Lee & Eunseop Park & Sangyub Lee, 2025. "Development of a Hybrid Modeling Framework for the Optimal Operation of Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-28, April.
    7. Komninos Angelakoglou & Ioannis Lampropoulos & Eleni Chatzigeorgiou & Paraskevi Giourka & Georgios Martinopoulos & Angelos-Saverios Skembris & Andreas Seitaridis & Georgia Kousovista & Nikos Nikolopou, 2025. "Advancing Energy-Efficient Renovation Through Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment and Costing: Insights and Experiences from VERIFY Tool Deployment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aitana Grasso-Cladera & Maritza Arenas-Perez & Paulina Wegertseder-Martinez & Erich Vilina & Josefina Mattoli-Sanchez & Francisco J. Parada, 2025. "Neuroscientific Insights into the Built Environment: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Indoor Environmental Quality, Physiological Dynamics, and Psychological Well-Being in Real-Life Contex," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(6), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Junhui Hu & Yang Du & Yueshan Ma & Danfeng Liu & Jingwei Yu & Zefu Miao, 2025. "Exploring the Spatiotemporal Impact of Landscape Patterns on Carbon Emissions Based on the Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression Model: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Temitope Adefarati & Gulshan Sharma & Pitshou N. Bokoro & Rajesh Kumar, 2025. "Advancing Renewable-Dominant Power Systems Through Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-54, October.
    4. Valeriu-Sebastian Hudișteanu & Ionuț Nica & Marina Verdeș & Iuliana Hudișteanu & Nelu-Cristian Cherecheș & Florin-Emilian Țurcanu & Iulian Gherasim & Catalin-Daniel Galatanu, 2025. "Technical and Economic Analysis of Sustainable Photovoltaic Systems for Street Lighting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-35, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8463-:d:1754336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.