IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2519-d755662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study on the Evaluation of Healthy City Construction in Typical Chinese Cities Based on Statistical Data and Land Use Data

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuoran Lv

    (Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
    International Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals, Beijing 100094, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Huadong Guo

    (Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
    International Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals, Beijing 100094, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Lu Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
    International Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals, Beijing 100094, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Dong Liang

    (Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
    International Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals, Beijing 100094, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

The 17 Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations propose to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages”, and to achieve this goal requires that countries strengthen their capacity to manage health risks. As a concept to describe urban construction, advocated by the World Health Organization, healthy cities can effectively solve the contradictions existing along the current urban development path at a macro level. A healthy city is a sustainable city that interacts with its environment, economy, population, services, and space, and realizes the well-being of its population from all perspectives. The construction of a healthy city is an important part of the transformation of Chinese urbanization. This article refers to the index systems of domestic and foreign government agencies, along with a literature research, to construct a healthy city evaluation index that takes into account the five aspects of environment, economy, population, service, and space, and selects Beijing (a policy-oriented city), Shanghai (an economy-oriented city), Nanchang (an industry-oriented city), Guiyang (a tourism-oriented city), Datong (resource-oriented city) as five cities according to type of urban development, using the entire-array-polygon method to analyze the construction level of these cities in terms of environment, economy, population, service, space and overall state of health from 2014 to 2018 based on statistical and land use data. The results of the study found that, in general, the construction of healthy cities in China currently experiences large year-to-year fluctuations and significant differences between cities. The construction and development of healthy cities are also closely related to factors such as urban economic strength, social welfare, and policy support.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuoran Lv & Huadong Guo & Lu Zhang & Dong Liang, 2022. "Comparative Study on the Evaluation of Healthy City Construction in Typical Chinese Cities Based on Statistical Data and Land Use Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2519-:d:755662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2519/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2519/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2519-:d:755662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.