IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2048-d747096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Carbon Storage Potential of Forested Wetland Soils in Two Physiographic Provinces of Northern Virginia, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Kathryn Ledford

    (Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA)

  • Stephanie Ann Schmidt

    (Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA)

  • Changwoo Ahn

    (Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA)

Abstract

This study assessed the soil carbon storage potential in terms of the total carbon (TC) and total carbon stocks (TC stocks) and associated soil physicochemical properties (i.e., soil pH, bulk density (D b ), and gravimetric soil moisture (GSM)) for four forested wetlands in the urbanized region of Northern Virginia (NOVA). The study sites were balanced between the two physiographic provinces of the region (Piedmont vs. Coastal Plain); at each site, soils were sampled and analyzed ( n = 180) at three depth intervals (0–10 cm; 10–20 cm; 20–30 cm). There was no significant difference in TC stocks between physiographic provinces ( p > 0.05); however, wetland soils had higher TC contents at the Coastal Plain (4.32 ± 0.41%) than in Piedmont (2.57 ± 0.22%; p < 0.05). Both D b and GSM significantly differed by physiographic province and were highly correlated to TC, indicating that the TC variability is strongly explained by D b (R 2 = 0.38) or GSM (R 2 = 0.39), respectively ( p < 0.01 for all). These outcomes highlight the capacity of urban forested wetlands to store carbon, especially in their topsoil (top 10 cm). Elucidating the carbon storage potentials of forested wetlands in an urbanized landscape may assist with future efforts to combat urban carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathryn Ledford & Stephanie Ann Schmidt & Changwoo Ahn, 2022. "Assessing Carbon Storage Potential of Forested Wetland Soils in Two Physiographic Provinces of Northern Virginia, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2048-:d:747096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2048/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2048/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Changwoo Ahn & Stephanie Schmidt, 2019. "Designing Wetlands as an Essential Infrastructural Element for Urban Development in the era of Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavithra Ganeshu & Terrence Fernando & Kaushal Keraminiyage, 2023. "Barriers to, and Enablers for, Stakeholder Collaboration in Risk-Sensitive Urban Planning: A Systematised Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Emma Salizzoni & Rocío Pérez-Campaña & Fernando Alcalde-Rodríguez & Ruben Talavera-Garcia, 2020. "Local Planning Practice towards Resilience: Insights from the Adaptive Co-Management and Design of a Mediterranean Wetland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Erqi Xu & Yimeng Chen, 2019. "Modeling Intersecting Processes of Wetland Shrinkage and Urban Expansion by a Time-Varying Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran & Andrea K. Gerlak, 2019. "A Multidisciplinary Approach to Analyzing Questions of Justice Issues in Urban Greenspace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Yu-Chi Chen & Chun-Han Shih, 2019. "Sustainable Management of Coastal Wetlands in Taiwan: A Review for Invasion, Conservation, and Removal of Mangroves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2048-:d:747096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.