IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p947-d725022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Firm Readiness to Adopt Cluster-Based Innovative Projects: A Segmentation Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kaoutar Jamai

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Ali Abidar

    (Department of Rural Development Engineering, National School of Agriculture, Meknes, km. 10, Route Haj Kaddour, B.P. S/40, Meknes 50001, Morocco)

  • Hans De Steur

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Xavier Gellynck

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

As innovation has garnered substantial attention on corporate success and sustainability, organizations must evaluate internal contexts to determine potential innovative practices and benefits. Firms need to investigate the determining factors of innovation preparedness as organizational innovation practices are catalyzed through internal elements. This study evaluates small and medium firms’ readiness to adopt and execute collaborative innovative projects within a future cluster and its impacts on organizational advantages, intentions, and attributes. Thereby, three dimensions were considered in examining organizational preparedness, namely, climate, culture, and motivation. A total of 70 firms operating in the labeled agri-food sector in Morocco were interviewed and homogenously classified using integrated hierarchical and non-hierarchical algorithms, following a segmentation approach. Three segments were identified, stressing the degree of organizational readiness to undertake innovative projects within future service clusters. The segments varied according to the firm’s sub-sector, experience, and resources. Considering the association of readiness with benefits and practical aims, the results broaden firm preparedness understanding to adopt innovative projects. The results also illustrate the relevance of adapting both innovative and beneficial project arrangements for firms with minor to moderate experience while addressing current issues across different segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaoutar Jamai & Ali Abidar & Hans De Steur & Xavier Gellynck, 2022. "Assessing Firm Readiness to Adopt Cluster-Based Innovative Projects: A Segmentation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:947-:d:725022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ole Jonny Klakegg, 2016. "Project Risk Management: Challenge Established Practice," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-3, December.
    2. Daniel Galvez & Manon Enjolras & Mauricio Camargo & Vincent Boly & Johan Claire, 2018. "Firm Readiness Level for Innovation Projects: A New Decision-Making Tool for Innovation Managers," Post-Print hal-01837932, HAL.
    3. Daniel Galvez & Manon Enjolras & Mauricio Camargo & Vincent Boly & Johan Claire, 2018. "Firm Readiness Level for Innovation Projects: A New Decision-Making Tool for Innovation Managers," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Ulrich Lichtenthaler, 2020. "Agile Innovation: The Complementarity of Design Thinking and Lean Startup," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global, vol. 11(1), pages 157-167, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kucher, Lesia & Hełdak, Maria & Orochovska, Lyudmila, 2023. "Assessment of the readiness of agrarian enterprises to implement innovative projects," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(1), March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mauricio Camargo & Laure Morel & Pascal Lhoste, 2021. "Progressive University Technology Transfer of Innovation Capabilities to SMEs: An Active and Modular Educational Partnership," Post-Print hal-03140931, HAL.
    2. Stéphanie Camaréna, 2021. "Engaging with Artificial Intelligence (AI) with a Bottom-Up Approach for the Purpose of Sustainability: Victorian Farmers Market Association, Melbourne Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Kong YuSheng & Masud Ibrahim, 2020. "Innovation Capabilities, Innovation Types, and Firm Performance: Evidence From the Banking Sector of Ghana," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    4. Graeme Joseph Allen, 2022. "Concepturealize™: a new contribution to generate real-needs-focussed, user-centred, lean business models," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-33, December.
    5. Kucher, Lesia & Hełdak, Maria & Orochovska, Lyudmila, 2023. "Assessment of the readiness of agrarian enterprises to implement innovative projects," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(1), March.
    6. Armstrong Amoah & Frederic Marimon, 2021. "Project Managers as Knowledge Workers: Competencies for Effective Project Management in Developing Countries," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, November.
    7. Brian J. Galli & Fuwei Qiu, 2023. "A Reflection Note on Applying Quantitative Decision-Making Approaches to Engineering Management," International Journal of Applied Management Sciences and Engineering (IJAMSE), IGI Global, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, January.
    8. Jerry Selvaseelan, 2018. "Development and Introduction of the Risk-Sentience Auxiliary Framework (RSAF) as an Enabler to the ISO 31000 and ISO 31010 for High-Risk Environments," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Galina Shevchenko & Leonas Ustinovichius & Dariusz Walasek, 2019. "The Evaluation of the Contractor’s Risk in Implementing the Investment Projects in Construction by Using the Verbal Analysis Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Chijioke Nwachukwu & Hieu Minh Vu, 2022. "Service Innovation, Marketing Innovation and Customer Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Competitive Intensity," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    11. Tobias Onshuus Malvik & Agnar Johansen & Olav Torp & Nils O. E. Olsson, 2021. "Evaluation of Target Value Delivery and Opportunity Management as Complementary Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:947-:d:725022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.