IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p767-d722067.html

Differences in Teachers’ Professional Action Competence in Education for Sustainable Development: The Importance of Teacher Co-Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Magdalena Isac

    (Center for Political Science Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    Italian Institute for the Evaluation of the Education System (INVALSI), 00153 Rome, Italy)

  • Wanda Sass

    (Research Unit Edubron, Department of Training and Education Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Jelle Boeve-de Pauw

    (Research Unit Edubron, Department of Training and Education Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Sven De Maeyer

    (Research Unit Edubron, Department of Training and Education Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Wouter Schelfhout

    (Research Unit Didactica, Antwerp School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Peter Van Petegem

    (Research Unit Edubron, Department of Training and Education Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Ellen Claes

    (Center for Political Science Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

This study builds on a research-practitioner partnership embedded within an education for sustainable development (ESD) project and aims to explore the major potential challenges (i.e., disciplinary boundaries set by subject specialization, especially in secondary education) and success factors (i.e., teacher co-learning experiences in ESD) associated with differences in teachers’ professional action competence (PACesd) in a sample of 557 in-service teachers in primary and secondary schools in Flanders, Belgium. The study employed a recently validated PACesd measurement instrument and involved quantitative data analysis in a structural equation modelling framework. The results show that primary education teachers tend to report higher PACesd levels compared to their peers in secondary education. Moreover, regardless of educational level, gender and teaching experience, all teachers participating in a working group or a learning community in ESD are more likely to show higher levels of PACesd. Implications of the findings, limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Magdalena Isac & Wanda Sass & Jelle Boeve-de Pauw & Sven De Maeyer & Wouter Schelfhout & Peter Van Petegem & Ellen Claes, 2022. "Differences in Teachers’ Professional Action Competence in Education for Sustainable Development: The Importance of Teacher Co-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:767-:d:722067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil Taylor & Frances Quinn & Kathy Jenkins & Helen Miller-Brown & Nadya Rizk & Theodosia Prodromou & Penelope Serow & Subhashni Taylor, 2019. "Education for Sustainability in the Secondary Sector—A Review," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 13(1), pages 102-122, March.
    2. Franziska Bertschy & Christine Künzli & Meret Lehmann, 2013. "Teachers’ Competencies for the Implementation of Educational Offers in the Field of Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuba Stouthart & Dury Bayram & Jan van der Veen, 2023. "Capturing Pedagogical Design Capacity of STEM Teacher Candidates: Education for Sustainable Development through Socioscientific Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    2. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:9393-9403 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Victoria G. Violanda & Dennis V. Madrigal, 2021. "Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): A Journey Towards Sustainable Future," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 20(1), pages 172-180, June.
    2. Quentin Ssossé & Johanna Wagner & Carina Hopper, 2021. "Assessing the Impact of ESD: Methods, Challenges, Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Sílvia Albareda-Tiana & Esther García-González & Rocío Jiménez-Fontana & Carmen Solís-Espallargas, 2019. "Implementing Pedagogical Approaches for ESD in Initial Teacher Training at Spanish Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Gisela Cebrián & Mercè Junyent & Ingrid Mulà, 2021. "Current Practices and Future Pathways towards Competencies in Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-9, August.
    5. Lukas Scherak & Marco Rieckmann, 2020. "Developing ESD Competences in Higher Education Institutions—Staff Training at the University of Vechta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Núria Monterde‐Miralles & Gisela Cebrián & Sergi Martín‐Arbós & Mercè Junyent, 2025. "Sustainability Competence Vignette Questionnaire for Secondary Education Students: Design and Validation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 971-987, November.
    7. Mirjam Braßler & Sandra Sprenger, 2021. "Fostering Sustainability Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours through a Tutor-Supported Interdisciplinary Course in Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Barbara Mazur & Anna Walczyna, 2022. "Sustainable Development Competences of Engineering Students in Light of the Industry 5.0 Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Andrea Corres & Marco Rieckmann & Anna Espasa & Isabel Ruiz-Mallén, 2020. "Educator Competences in Sustainability Education: A Systematic Review of Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Yousif Abdelrahim & Aliah Zafer, 2024. "How Students’ Well-Being, Education for Sustainable Development, and Sustainable Development Relate: A Case of Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Razvan Bologa & Ana-Ramona Lupu & Catalin Boja & Tiberiu Marian Georgescu, 2017. "Sustaining Employability: A Process for Introducing Cloud Computing, Big Data, Social Networks, Mobile Programming and Cybersecurity into Academic Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Eileen Merritt & Annie Hale & Leanna Archambault, 2018. "Changes in Pre-Service Teachers’ Values, Sense of Agency, Motivation and Consumption Practices: A Case Study of an Education for Sustainability Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Fengtao Guo & Joseph Lane & Yushan Duan & Joseph P. Stoltman & Olga Khlebosolova & Hao Lei & Weiguo Zhou, 2018. "Sustainable Development in Geography Education for Middle School in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    14. Eliyawati & Ari Widodo & Ida Kaniawati & Hiroki Fujii, 2023. "The Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Science Teacher Competency to Teach ESD," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Youmen Chaaban & Xiangyun Du & Adrian Lundberg & Abdullah Abu-Tineh, 2023. "Education Stakeholders’ Viewpoints about an ESD Competency Framework: Q Methodology Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Bulan Prabawani & Sudharto Prawata Hadi & Irina Safitri Zen & Nurul Retno Hapsari & Ilham Ainuddin, 2022. "Systems Thinking and Leadership of Teachers in Education for Sustainable Development: A Scale Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Anna Oberrauch & Helga Mayr & Ivan Nikitin & Tanja Bügler & Thorsten Kosler & Christian Vollmer, 2021. "“I Wanted a Profession That Makes a Difference”—An Online Survey of First-Year Students’ Study Choice Motives and Sustainability-Related Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-28, July.
    18. Shira Vidal & Miriam Kuckuck, 2025. "Pre-Service Teacher Action Competence in Education for Sustainable Development: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-29, April.
    19. Erin Redman & Arnim Wiek & Aaron Redman, 2018. "Continuing Professional Development in Sustainability Education for K-12 Teachers: Principles, Programme, Applications, Outlook," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 12(1), pages 59-80, March.
    20. Kifah Imara & Fahriye Altinay, 2021. "Integrating Education for Sustainable Development Competencies in Teacher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:767-:d:722067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.