IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16817-d1003956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Considerations for the Use of Nature-Based Solutions in Climate Services and Adaptation

Author

Listed:
  • Arsum Pathak

    (National Wildlife Federation, Austin, TX 78752, USA)

  • Laura E. Hilberg

    (EcoAdapt, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110, USA)

  • Lara J. Hansen

    (EcoAdapt, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110, USA)

  • Bruce A. Stein

    (National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC 20006, USA)

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NbS) involve the reliance on natural or nature-based systems to enhance community resilience through delivering both climate adaptation and mitigation outcomes. While NbS do not necessarily represent new “technology” or methods, the intentional incorporation of these approaches into climate adaptation and mitigation efforts is often considered novel, particularly within the climate services sector where interventions have historically prioritized structural infrastructure approaches. NbS can offer an effective replacement for or complement to such traditional infrastructure approaches. Additionally, natural and nature-based systems can respond to climate change in a manner that engineered solutions often cannot, providing long-term holistic adaptation and mitigation success with additional benefits to ecosystem services such as improved air and water quality, carbon sequestration, outdoor recreation, and biodiversity protection. The incorporation of NbS as a core component of climate services increases the likelihood of adoption and effective implementation, ensuring greater long-term effectiveness for both communities and the natural systems on which they depend. This article supports the adoption and effective implementation of NbS by climate service providers through presenting a set of seven “key considerations” for their use in community-based adaptation. These key considerations are based on a review of work in the field to date, both within the United States and globally. Although these key considerations were developed in support of US adaptation planning applications (specifically, the US Climate Resilience Toolkit), they have global relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Arsum Pathak & Laura E. Hilberg & Lara J. Hansen & Bruce A. Stein, 2022. "Key Considerations for the Use of Nature-Based Solutions in Climate Services and Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16817-:d:1003956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Hewitt & Simon Mason & David Walland, 2012. "The Global Framework for Climate Services," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 831-832, December.
    2. Tara G. Martin & James E. M. Watson, 2016. "Intact ecosystems provide best defence against climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 122-124, February.
    3. Alessandro Rigolon & Jeremy Németh, 2020. "Green gentrification or ‘just green enough’: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 402-420, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luke J. Harrington, 2017. "Investigating differences between event-as-class and probability density-based attribution statements with emerging climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(4), pages 641-654, April.
    2. Michel Jancloes & Madeleine Thomson & María Mánez Costa & Chris Hewitt & Carlos Corvalan & Tufa Dinku & Rachel Lowe & Mary Hayden, 2014. "Climate Services to Improve Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-5, April.
    3. Na’Taki Osborne Jelks & Viniece Jennings & Alessandro Rigolon, 2021. "Green Gentrification and Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Yasser Jezzini & Ghiwa Assaf & Rayan H. Assaad, 2023. "Models and Methods for Quantifying the Environmental, Economic, and Social Benefits and Challenges of Green Infrastructure: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-40, May.
    5. Kevin Raaphorst & Gerben Koers & Gerald Jan Ellen & Amy Oen & Bjørn Kalsnes & Lisa van Well & Jana Koerth & Rutger van der Brugge, 2020. "Mind the Gap: Towards a Typology of Climate Service Usability Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Kirsten Halsnæs & Lisa Bay & Mads Lykke Dømgaard & Per Skougaard Kaspersen & Morten Andreas Dahl Larsen, 2020. "Accelerating Climate Service Development for Renewable Energy, Finance and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Simona Meiler & Thomas Vogt & Nadia Bloemendaal & Alessio Ciullo & Chia-Ying Lee & Suzana J. Camargo & Kerry Emanuel & David N. Bresch, 2022. "Intercomparison of regional loss estimates from global synthetic tropical cyclone models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Bo Wang & Shoukui He & Weiwen Ma, 2022. "Does Park Size Affect Green Gentrification? Insights from Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Clara Mosso & Diego Pons & Cristian Beza-Beza, 2022. "A Long Way toward Climate Smart Agriculture: The Importance of Addressing Gender Inequity in the Agricultural Sector of Guatemala," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Gigi Owen & Daniel B. Ferguson & Ben McMahan, 2019. "Contextualizing climate science: applying social learning systems theory to knowledge production, climate services, and use-inspired research," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 151-170, November.
    11. Lledó, Ll. & Torralba, V. & Soret, A. & Ramon, J. & Doblas-Reyes, F.J., 2019. "Seasonal forecasts of wind power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 91-100.
    12. Sophie Haines, 2019. "Managing expectations: articulating expertise in climate services for agriculture in Belize," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 43-59, November.
    13. Ling Yu & Pengjun Zhao & Junqing Tang & Liang Pang & Zhaoya Gong, 2023. "Social inequality of urban park use during the COVID-19 pandemic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Blane Harvey & Lindsey Jones & Logan Cochrane & Roop Singh, 2019. "The evolving landscape of climate services in sub-Saharan Africa: What roles have NGOs played?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 81-98, November.
    15. Isabelle Anguelovski & James J. T. Connolly & Helen Cole & Melissa Garcia-Lamarca & Margarita Triguero-Mas & Francesc Baró & Nicholas Martin & David Conesa & Galia Shokry & Carmen Pérez Pulgar & Lucia, 2022. "Green gentrification in European and North American cities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Elena Lioubimtseva & Charlotte da Cunha, 2023. "The Role of Non-Climate Data in Equitable Climate Adaptation Planning: Lessons from Small French and American Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Meaghan Daly & Lisa Dilling, 2019. "The politics of “usable” knowledge: examining the development of climate services in Tanzania," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 61-80, November.
    18. Momtaz Jahan & Julia Reis & Julie Shortridge, 2023. "Assessing climate service products with evaluation metrics: an application to decision support tools for climate change adaptation in the USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(8), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Mike Hulme, 2014. "Behind the curve: science and the politics of global warming," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 273-278, October.
    20. J. Amy Belaire & Heather Bass & Heather Venhaus & Keri Barfield & Tim Pannkuk & Katherine Lieberknecht & Shalene Jha, 2023. "High-Performance Landscapes: Re-Thinking Design and Management Choices to Enhance Ecological Benefits in Urban Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16817-:d:1003956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.