IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15599-d982056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Decision Support Systems Help Improve the Sustainable Use of Fungicides in Wheat?

Author

Listed:
  • Ketel Christian Prahl

    (Department of Plant Diseases and Crop Protection, Institute of Phytopathology, Faculty of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany)

  • Holger Klink

    (Department of Plant Diseases and Crop Protection, Institute of Phytopathology, Faculty of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany)

  • Mario Hasler

    (Lehrfach Variationsstatistik, Faculty of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany)

  • Susanne Hagen

    (Department of Plant Protection, Chamber of Agriculture for Schleswig-Holstein, Grüner Kamp 15-17, 24768 Rendsburg, Germany)

  • Joseph-Alexander Verreet

    (Department of Plant Diseases and Crop Protection, Institute of Phytopathology, Faculty of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany)

  • Tim Birr

    (Department of Plant Diseases and Crop Protection, Institute of Phytopathology, Faculty of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany)

Abstract

Wheat is one of the most economically important field crops worldwide. Foliar diseases are a major threat to wheat productivity and are primarily managed by implementing less susceptible cultivars and using fungicides. With the “Farm to Fork” strategy under consideration by the European Union to reduce pesticide usage by 50% by 2030, this elucidates the importance of utilizing decision support systems (DSS) to optimize fungicide applications. Therefore, three DSSs of different origins, namely the IPM-Wheat Model Schleswig-Holstein (scientific), the ISIP system (federal), and the xarvio © FIELD MANAGER (commercial), were analysed under maritime climate conditions at three locations in a high input area of wheat cultivation in northern Germany from 2019 to 2021. Fungicide efficacy was evaluated for yield as well as for the management of prevalent pathogens (Septoria tritici blotch, glume blotch, tan spot, powdery mildew, stripe rust, and leaf rust) on two different commercially available cultivars (highly and moderately susceptible). Compared to a stage-oriented standard system, no significant decrease in yield was observed in both cultivars, despite up to a 50% reduction in fungicide use through the use of DSSs. This was attributed to an optimized timing of fungicide applications, which resulted in slightly lower but still tolerable disease suppression efficacy compared to the stage-oriented system. In conclusion, minor disease severities are often overestimated, and DSSs can help improve the sustainability of fungicide use in wheat and pesticides in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Ketel Christian Prahl & Holger Klink & Mario Hasler & Susanne Hagen & Joseph-Alexander Verreet & Tim Birr, 2022. "Can Decision Support Systems Help Improve the Sustainable Use of Fungicides in Wheat?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15599-:d:982056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holger Klink & Ketel Christian Prahl & Mario Hasler & Joseph-Alexander Verreet & Tim Birr, 2022. "Efficiency and Effectivity of a Biological–Epidemiological Fungal Disease Management System in Wheat—A Study of 26 Years," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15599-:d:982056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.