IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14598-d965098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Searching for Pedagogical Answers to Support STEM Learning: Gender Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Daniela

    (Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art, University of Latvia, LV-1083 Riga, Latvia)

  • Silvija Kristapsone

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Latvia, LV-1083 Riga, Latvia)

  • Gunta Kraģe

    (Regional Centre, University of Latvia, LV-1083 Riga, Latvia)

  • Ludmila Belogrudova

    (Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1083 Riga, Latvia)

  • Aleksandrs Vorobjovs

    (Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art, University of Latvia, LV-1083 Riga, Latvia)

  • Ilona Krone

    (Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art, University of Latvia, LV-1083 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

This article analyzes the results of a study on the situation concerning the educational achievements of girls and boys in the STEM field in Latvia. The study was conducted at the compulsory education level to understand the conditions in the learning environment that can predictably affect the academic achievements of girls. For the purposes of the study, a survey questionnaire was developed, which was filled out by 1847 students from the 7th–12th grades. The obtained results show which factors affect learning achievement in STEM subjects for students with low and high learning achievements in groups divided into boys and girls and which pedagogical activities can predictably improve STEM learning achievements. The research data confirm that there are differences in predicted learning achievements in groups of boys and girls with high learning achievements, depending on the pedagogical strategy used. Additionally, the results of the study confirm that the most significant factor for a predictable increase in learning achievements in the STEM field is students liking mathematics and, in the case of high learning achievements, them liking chemistry. An indicator that has a significant negative impact on academic achievement in STEM subjects is a dislike of physics, which appeared in the group of girls with low academic achievements. Liking other STEM subjects to improve student achievement did not appear statistically significant in any of the analyzed groups. This study is essential to supplement the knowledge base on gender differences in learning achievements in STEM subjects and is also important for the educational space of Latvia because the learning achievements of girls in the STEM field are lower in this country than it is for boys. The obtained results show which methods of pedagogical work have a higher impact on increasing the predicted learning achievements and also show potential future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Daniela & Silvija Kristapsone & Gunta Kraģe & Ludmila Belogrudova & Aleksandrs Vorobjovs & Ilona Krone, 2022. "Searching for Pedagogical Answers to Support STEM Learning: Gender Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14598-:d:965098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14598/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14598/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jia, Ning, 2021. "Do stricter high school math requirements raise college STEM attainment?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14598-:d:965098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.