IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14040-d956078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vitality Evaluation of Public Spaces in Historical and Cultural Blocks Based on Multi-Source Data, a Case Study of Suzhou Changmen

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215000, China)

  • Qi Liu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215000, China)

  • Xi Zhou

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215000, China)

Abstract

As an intermediate link in the three-level heritage protection system of City–Block–Relic, the historical and cultural block is the most important part. As a component of a city, the vitality of historical and cultural blocks is related to the quality of urban space and the inheritance of cultural memory, and it is of great significance to urban renewal and sustainable development. However, traditional urban vitality evaluation methods need to deal with a large number of complex data, and it is often challenging to take into account the dual characteristics of space and culture. Traditional data and independent analysis strategy cannot not function well anymore. Therefore, this study proposes a vitality evaluation model based on multi-source data, which can account for the dual characteristics of space and culture, carry out dimension-reduced analysis for complex elements, so as to display the vitality image and indicate the key influencing factors of the block vitality. This maybe of important significance for exploring the internal dynamism of historical and cultural blocks. Firstly, guided by the “space-culture” composition of historical and cultural blocks, a wide variety of multi-level complex influencing factors of the vitality can be summed up to establish a three-layer vitality evaluation model. Secondly, the integration of multi-source data is realized by using the digital platform and giving out vitality pictures of the block. In this process, the Changmen historical and cultural block of Suzhou is taken as the sample for empirical research. Finally, the evaluation model is verified by combining the field investigation and the external representation of vitality. The calculation results are compared with the external manifestation of vitality, demonstrating the critical influencing factors of the vitality of public space in historical and cultural blocks, pointing out the direction for the creation of a residential environment and the promotion of vitality in the blocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Zhang & Qi Liu & Xi Zhou, 2022. "Vitality Evaluation of Public Spaces in Historical and Cultural Blocks Based on Multi-Source Data, a Case Study of Suzhou Changmen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14040-:d:956078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14040/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14040/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mei Liu & Ying Jiang & Junliang He, 2021. "Quantitative Evaluation on Street Vitality: A Case Study of Zhoujiadu Community in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Yang Zhao & Junhan Liu & Yali Zheng, 2022. "Preservation and Renewal: A Study on Visual Evaluation of Urban Historical and Cultural Street Landscape in Quanzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    3. Xiaoyang Zhu & Shang-Chia Chiou, 2022. "A Study on the Sustainable Development of Historic District Landscapes Based on Place Attachment among Tourists: A Case Study of Taiping Old Street, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenqing Ding & Qinqin Wei & Jing Jin & Juanjuan Nie & Fanfan Zhang & Xiaotian Zhou & Youhua Ma, 2023. "Research on Public Space Micro-Renewal Strategy of Historical and Cultural Blocks in Sanhe Ancient Town under Perception Quantification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Pinyue Ouyang & Xiaowen Wu, 2023. "Analysis and Evaluation of the Service Capacity of a Waterfront Public Space Using Point-of-Interest Data Combined with Questionnaire Surveys," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Ding & Zhengdong Gao & Shanshan Ma, 2022. "Understanding Social Spaces in Tourist Villages through Space Syntax Analysis: Cases of Villages in Huizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Yunzi Yang & Yuanyuan Ma & Hongzan Jiao, 2021. "Exploring the Correlation between Block Vitality and Block Environment Based on Multisource Big Data: Taking Wuhan City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Tongwen Wang & Ya Li & Haidong Li & Shuaijun Chen & Hongkai Li & Yunxing Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Vitality Evaluation of Parks and Squares in Medium-Sized Chinese Cities from the Perspective of Urban Functional Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Han Zou & Ruichao Liu & Wen Cheng & Jingjing Lei & Jing Ge, 2023. "The Association between Street Built Environment and Street Vitality Based on Quantitative Analysis in Historic Areas: A Case Study of Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Yunjing Wu & Jing Wang & Sunnie Sing-Yeung Lau & Stephen Siu Yu Lau & Yijia Miao, 2022. "An Improved Publicness Assessment Tool Based on a Combined Spatial Model: Case Study of Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Jinliu Chen & Haoqi Wang & Zhuo Yang & Pengcheng Li & Geng Ma & Xiaoxin Zhao, 2023. "Comparative Spatial Vitality Evaluation of Traditional Settlements Based on SUF: Taking Anren Ancient Town’s Urban Design as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Jizhong Shao & Minge Yang & Guan Liu & Ye Li & Dan Luo & Yanran Tan & Yuxin Zhang & Qize Song, 2021. "Urban Sub-Center Design Framework Based on the Walkability Evaluation Method: Taking Coomera Town Sub-Center as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Bohong Zheng & Rui Guo & Komi Bernard Bedra & Yanfen Xiang, 2022. "Quantitative Evaluation of Urban Style at Street Level: A Case Study of Hengyang County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, March.
    9. Haozun Sun & Hong Xu & Hao He & Quanfeng Wei & Yuelin Yan & Zheng Chen & Xuanhe Li & Jialun Zheng & Tianyue Li, 2023. "A Spatial Analysis of Urban Streets under Deep Learning Based on Street View Imagery: Quantifying Perceptual and Elemental Perceptual Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-30, October.
    10. Shujing Dong & Danjie Shen, 2023. "A Study of Historical Urban Landscape Layering in Luoyang Based on Historical Map Translation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Yuhan Shao & Yuting Yin & Zhenying Xue & Dongbo Ma, 2023. "Assessing and Comparing the Visual Comfort of Streets across Four Chinese Megacities Using AI-Based Image Analysis and the Perceptive Evaluation Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Jiani Zhang & Xun Zhu & Ming Gao, 2022. "The Relationship between Habitat Diversity and Tourists’ Visual Preference in Urban Wetland Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Jingyi Dong & Jun Zhang & Xudong Yang, 2023. "How Does the Living Street Environment in the Old Urban Districts Affect Walking Behavior? A General Multi-Factor Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Haipeng Zhang & Kangning Xiong & Guangyu Fei & Ao Jin & Shirong Zhang, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Conservation Intentions of Visitors to a World Heritage Site: A Case Study of Libo Karst," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Yixing Chen & Qilin Zhang & Zhang Deng & Xinran Fan & Zimu Xu & Xudong Kang & Kailing Pan & Zihao Guo, 2022. "Research on Green View Index of Urban Roads Based on Street View Image Recognition: A Case Study of Changsha Downtown Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Wanshu Wu & Ziying Ma & Jinhan Guo & Xinyi Niu & Kai Zhao, 2022. "Evaluating the Effects of Built Environment on Street Vitality at the City Level: An Empirical Research Based on Spatial Panel Durbin Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14040-:d:956078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.