IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9655-d881401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Perceptions Can Distinguish ‘Paper Parks’ from Marine Protected Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Veronica Relano

    (Sea Around Us, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Tiffany Mak

    (Sea Around Us, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Shelumiel Ortiz

    (Quantitative Aquatics, Khush Hall, IRRI (International Rice Research Institute), Los Baños 4031, Philippines)

  • Daniel Pauly

    (Sea Around Us, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

Abstract

While numerous Marine Protected Areas (MPA) have been created in the last decades, their effectiveness must be assessed in the context of the country’s biodiversity conservation policies and must be verified by local observations. Currently, the observations of local stakeholders, such as those from non-governmental organizations (NGOs), academics, government civil servants, journalists, and fishers, are not considered in any MPA database. The Sea Around Us has added observations from local stakeholders to address this gap, adding their perspectives to its reconstructed fisheries catch database, and to at least one MPA in each country’s Exclusive Economic Zone. It is important to pursue and incentivize stakeholder knowledge sharing to achieve a better understanding of the current level of marine protection, as this information is a valuable addition to the existing MPA databases. To address this gap, we demonstrated that personal emails containing a one-question questionnaire about the fishing levels in an MPA are an excellent way to gather data from local stakeholders, and that this works especially well for respondents in NGOs, academia, and governments. Of the stakeholders who replied to our personalized email, 66% provided us with the fishing level of the MPA that we asked for. The paper also presents how to access this information through the Sea Around Us website, which details in anonymized form the most common fishing levels for each selected MPA, as perceived or observed by different local stakeholder groups. This information is a unique and novel addition to a website that is concerned with marine conservation and contributes to a more accurate and inclusive discourse around MPAs. This information also helps to identify the gaps that need to be addressed to turn ‘paper parks’ (i.e., MPAs that are legally designated but not effective) into effective MPAs, which can contribute to climate-resilient ‘blue economies’.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronica Relano & Tiffany Mak & Shelumiel Ortiz & Daniel Pauly, 2022. "Stakeholder Perceptions Can Distinguish ‘Paper Parks’ from Marine Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9655-:d:881401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9655/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9655/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCrea-Strub, Ashley & Zeller, Dirk & Rashid Sumaila, Ussif & Nelson, Jay & Balmford, Andrew & Pauly, Daniel, 2011. "Understanding the cost of establishing marine protected areas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-9, January.
    2. David A. Gill & Michael B. Mascia & Gabby N. Ahmadia & Louise Glew & Sarah E. Lester & Megan Barnes & Ian Craigie & Emily S. Darling & Christopher M. Free & Jonas Geldmann & Susie Holst & Olaf P. Jens, 2017. "Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally," Nature, Nature, vol. 543(7647), pages 665-669, March.
    3. Pita, Cristina & Theodossiou, Ioannis & Pierce, Graham J., 2013. "The perceptions of Scottish inshore fishers about marine protected areas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 254-263.
    4. Veronica Relano & Daniel Pauly, 2022. "Philopatry as a Tool to Define Tentative Closed Migration Cycles and Conservation Areas for Large Pelagic Fishes in the Pacific," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Christopher Pala, 2013. "Detective work uncovers under-reported overfishing," Nature, Nature, vol. 496(7443), pages 18-18, April.
    6. Saarman, Emily T. & Carr, Mark H., 2013. "The California Marine Life Protection Act: A balance of top down and bottom up governance in MPA planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 41-49.
    7. Graham J. Edgar & Rick D. Stuart-Smith & Trevor J. Willis & Stuart Kininmonth & Susan C. Baker & Stuart Banks & Neville S. Barrett & Mikel A. Becerro & Anthony T. F. Bernard & Just Berkhout & Colin D., 2014. "Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7487), pages 216-220, February.
    8. Veronica Relano & Maria Lourdes Deng Palomares & Daniel Pauly, 2021. "Comparing the Performance of Four Very Large Marine Protected Areas with Different Levels of Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    9. James E. M. Watson & Nigel Dudley & Daniel B. Segan & Marc Hockings, 2014. "The performance and potential of protected areas," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7525), pages 67-73, November.
    10. Garibaldi, Luca, 2012. "The FAO global capture production database: A six-decade effort to catch the trend," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 760-768.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank, 2021. "Banking on Protected Areas," World Bank Publications - Reports 35737, The World Bank Group.
    2. repec:ags:aaea22:335483 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Venetia Alexa Hargreaves-Allen & Susana Mourato & Eleanor Jane Milner-Gulland, 2017. "Drivers of coral reef marine protected area performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Evan Artis & Noella J Gray & Lisa M Campbell & Rebecca L Gruby & Leslie Acton & Sarah Bess Zigler & Lillian Mitchell, 2020. "Stakeholder perspectives on large-scale marine protected areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Yunzhou Li & Ming Sun & Chongliang Zhang & Yunlei Zhang & Binduo Xu & Yiping Ren & Yong Chen, 2020. "Evaluating fisheries conservation strategies in the socio-ecological system: A grid-based dynamic model to link spatial conservation prioritization tools with tactical fisheries management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Raphael Seguin & David Mouillot & Joshua E. Cinner & Rick D. Stuart Smith & Eva Maire & Nicholas A. J. Graham & Matthew McLean & Laurent Vigliola & Nicolas Loiseau, 2023. "Towards process-oriented management of tropical reefs in the anthropocene," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 148-157, February.
    7. Villaseñor-Derbez, Juan Carlos, 2019. "An interdisciplinary evaluation of community-based TURF-reserves," MarXiv 8vgqu, Center for Open Science.
    8. Fabrizio D’Ascenzo & Andrea Rocchi & Stefano Cerioni & Gaetano Zarlenga & Nicolò Passeri & Francesco Piacentini & Cristina Lo Fazio & Cristina Gerardis & Clara Cicatiello, 2022. "Conveying environmental information to fishers: a smartphone application on marine protected areas," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 453-465, September.
    9. Veronica Relano & Maria Lourdes Deng Palomares & Daniel Pauly, 2021. "Comparing the Performance of Four Very Large Marine Protected Areas with Different Levels of Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Antonio Di Cintio & Federico Niccolini & Sara Scipioni & Fabio Bulleri, 2023. "Avoiding “Paper Parks”: A Global Literature Review on Socioeconomic Factors Underpinning the Effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Liang Chang & Teiji Watanabe, 2021. "Dilemma Faced by Management Staff in China’s Protected Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Hasita Bhammar & Wendy Li & Christel Maria Moller Molina & Valerie Hickey & Jo Pendry & Urvashi Narain, 2021. "Framework for Sustainable Recovery of Tourism in Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, March.
    13. Rasheed, A. Rifaee, 2020. "Marine protected areas and human well-being – A systematic review and recommendations," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    14. Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi & Amanda E. Bates & Giovanni Strona & Fabio Bulleri & Barbara Horta e Costa & Graham J. Edgar & Bernat Hereu & Dan C. Reed & Rick D. Stuart-Smith & Neville S. Barrett & David, 2024. "Marine protected areas promote stability of reef fish communities under climate warming," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Read, Andrew D. & West, Ronald J. & Kelaher, Brendan P., 2015. "Using compliance data to improve marine protected area management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 119-127.
    16. Cláudio C. Maretti & Sueli Angelo Furlan & Marta de Azevedo Irving & Yasmin Xavier Guimarães Nasri & Camila Gonçalves de Oliveira Rodrigues & Beatriz Barros Aydos & Rodrigo Martins dos Santos & Erika , 2023. "Collaborative Conservation for Inclusive, Equitable, and Effective Systems of Protected and Conserved Areas—Insights from Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-32, December.
    17. Michael R. Appleton & Alexandre Courtiol & Lucy Emerton & James L. Slade & Andrew Tilker & Lauren C. Warr & Mónica Álvarez Malvido & James R. Barborak & Louise Bruin & Rosalie Chapple & Jennifer C. Da, 2022. "Protected area personnel and ranger numbers are insufficient to deliver global expectations," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1100-1110, December.
    18. Manfredi Di Lorenzo & Antonio Calò & Antonio Di Franco & Giacomo Milisenda & Giorgio Aglieri & Carlo Cattano & Marco Milazzo & Paolo Guidetti, 2022. "Small-scale fisheries catch more threatened elasmobranchs inside partially protected areas than in unprotected areas," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Chunrong Mi & Liang Ma & Mengyuan Yang & Xinhai Li & Shai Meiri & Uri Roll & Oleksandra Oskyrko & Daniel Pincheira-Donoso & Lilly P. Harvey & Daniel Jablonski & Barbod Safaei-Mahroo & Hanyeh Ghaffari , 2023. "Global Protected Areas as refuges for amphibians and reptiles under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Flückiger, Matthias & Ludwig, Markus, 2015. "Economic shocks in the fisheries sector and maritime piracy," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 107-125.
    21. Amrullah Rosadi & Paul Dargusch & Taryono Taryono, 2022. "Understanding How Marine Protected Areas Influence Local Prosperity—A Case Study of Gili Matra, Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9655-:d:881401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.