IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7969-d852221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responding to the Popular Demand: Itinerary for the Socio-Political Learning of Situated Agroecologies in Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Peredo Parada

    (Group of Agroecology and Environment (GAMA), University of Santiago de Chile, Santiago 7501015, Chile
    Environment and Society Program, Pablo Olavide University of Sevilla, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
    Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Ryton Gardens Campus, Coventry University, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK)

  • Claudia Barrera Salas

    (Group of Agroecology and Environment (GAMA), University of Santiago de Chile, Santiago 7501015, Chile
    STAND Group, University of Granada, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, Calle Prof. Vicente Callao 3, 18011 Granada, Spain)

  • Sara Burbi

    (Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Ryton Gardens Campus, Coventry University, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK)

Abstract

Agroecology has proven to be successful in responding to the demands and needs of a collective due to the relevance of its approach and proposals, which are built collaboratively between all the actors under a specific context that focuses on the actions developed. This is facilitated when spaces of horizontal interaction are generated through dialogues between different perspectives and experiences. In this perspective, agroecological training in higher education, i.e., university level, requires structural changes that go beyond the incorporation of technical content. Based on a critical documentary analysis of the records generated in the implementation of teaching innovation projects, the learning itinerary in agroecology is presented, consisting of four certifications based on transformational learning and supported by active methodologies. The potentialities, including marketing potential, of the proposed learning itinerary relate to curricular design, the articulation of the itinerary, the suitability of the learning methodologies used, the performance of the teachers, and the participation of the students. It is concluded that the implementation of flexible itineraries allows for addressing the transformation processes necessary for an agroecological transition in which we see a convergence of students’ skills, the learning objectives, and the requirements of the various actors with which they interact.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Peredo Parada & Claudia Barrera Salas & Sara Burbi, 2022. "Responding to the Popular Demand: Itinerary for the Socio-Political Learning of Situated Agroecologies in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7969-:d:852221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7969/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7969/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Barkin & Mario E. Fuente Carrasco & Daniel Tagle Zamora, 2012. "La significación de una Economía Ecológica radical," Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, Red Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, vol. 19, pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Remig, Moritz C., 2017. "Structured pluralism in ecological economics — A reply to Peter Söderbaum's commentary," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 533-537.
    2. Fuente-Carrasco, Mario Enrique & Barkin, David & Clark-Tapia, Ricardo, 2019. "Governance from below and environmental justice: Community water management from the perspective of social metabolism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 52-61.
    3. Buchs, Arnaud & Petit, Olivier & Roman, Philippe, 2020. "Can social ecological economics of water reinforce the “big tent”?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. David Barkin & Blanca Lemus, 2013. "Understanding Progress: A Heterodox Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Remig, Moritz C., 2015. "Unraveling the veil of fuzziness: A thick description of sustainability economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 194-202.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7969-:d:852221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.