IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3120-d515623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Smart City Standards, Implementation and Cluster Models of Cities in North America and Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Milan Kubina

    (Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Dominika Šulyová

    (Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Josef Vodák

    (Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

Abstract

Sustainability in Smart Cities is a current and trendy topic in a global sense. The primary impetus for writing this article was to create a general implementation model for the smart governance of European Smart Cities based on the American best practice. The ambition is to be able to modify the generally created model to meet the local conditions of all countries. The aim of the article is to point out the essential elements and differences between the implementation standards, models and clusters in the cities of North America and Europe, including their benefits and limitations. This article compared standards, implementation and cluster models for Smart Cities in North America and Europe through a secondary analysis from Arcadis and IDC consultants, standards agencies, and relevant sources. In addition, comparisons and summaries of the results were used. The results of this article point out the fundamental differences between the American and European approaches to building Smart Cities. American models are more centrist-oriented to people and complex in their simplicity, thus achieving a higher degree of reputation. Europeans are less consistent and top-down oriented. The new model will make European Smart Cities more focused on the needs and expectations of all stakeholders. The main results of this article are the answers to the research questions and the general implementation model, the verification of which will take place in practice in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Milan Kubina & Dominika Šulyová & Josef Vodák, 2021. "Comparison of Smart City Standards, Implementation and Cluster Models of Cities in North America and Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3120-:d:515623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3120/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3120/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lombardi, P. & Giordano, S. & Caragliu, A. & Del Bo, C., 2011. "An advanced triple-helix network model for smart cities performance," Serie Research Memoranda 0045, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. Caragliu, A. & Del Bo, C. & Nijkamp, P., 2009. "Smart cities in Europe," Serie Research Memoranda 0048, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blanca Estela Bernal Escoto & Nancy Imelda Montero Delgado & Flavio Abel Rivera Aguirre, 2021. "Strategic Analysis of Sustainable Tourism in Baja California against COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Santis, Roberta & Fasano, Alessandra & Mignolli, Nadia & Villa, Anna, 2014. "Smart city: fact and fiction," MPRA Paper 54536, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Kyunam Kim & Jung-Kyu Jung & Jae Young Choi, 2016. "Impact of the Smart City Industry on the Korean National Economy: Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Mundula, Luigi & Auci, Sabrina, 2013. "Smart Cities and a Stochastic Frontier Analysis: A Comparison among European Cities," MPRA Paper 51586, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Roberta De Santis & Alessandra Fasano & Nadia Mignolli & Anna Villa, 2015. "A primer on city "smartness" measurement," RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 34-51.
    5. Radosław Korneć, 2020. "The role of stakeholders in shaping smart solutions in Polish cities," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 1981-1995, March.
    6. Tuba Bakıcı & Esteve Almirall & Jonathan Wareham, 2013. "A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(2), pages 135-148, June.
    7. Palmyra Repette & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Tan Yigitcanlar & Denilson Sell & Eduardo Costa, 2021. "The Evolution of City-as-a-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance with Collective Knowledge-Based Platform Urbanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Abood Khaled Alamoudi & Rotimi Boluwatife Abidoye & Terence Y. M. Lam, 2022. "The Impact of Stakeholders’ Management Measures on Citizens’ Participation Level in Implementing Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Luca PIOVANO & David GARRIDO & Ricardo SILVA & Iris GALLOSO, 2014. "What (Smart) Data Visualizations Can Offer to Smart City Science," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(96), pages 89-112, 4th quart.
    10. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "Creative Buzz Districts In Smart Cities: Urban Retro-Fitting And Urban Forward-Fitting Plans," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 37-57, DECEMBER.
    11. Amel ATTOUR & Marc-Hubert DEPRET, 2013. "TIC, soutenabilité et stratégie territoriale des villes durables : le cas des EcoCités en France [ICT, Sustainability and Territorial Strategy of Sustainable Cities: The EcoCities in France]," Working Papers 36, Réseau de Recherche sur l’Innovation. / Research Network on Innovation.
    12. Vieira, Fabiana C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Govindan, Kannan & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F. & Banaitis, Audrius, 2022. "Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Enrico di Bella & Matteo Corsi & Lucia Leporatti, 2015. "A Multi-indicator Approach for Smart Security Policy Making," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 653-675, July.
    14. Kamila Borsekova & Katarina Petrikova & Anna Vanova, 2015. "Building of smart cities in specific conditions of transitional economies," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1030, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Shenja van der GRAAF, 2014. "Smarten Up! Open Data, Toolkits and Participation in the Social City," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(96), pages 35-52, 4th quart.
    16. Francesc González-Reverté, 2019. "Building Sustainable Smart Destinations: An Approach Based on the Development of Spanish Smart Tourism Plans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Ioana Marinela (Gavriluță) Turtă, 2022. "The influence of Smart City development in Romania on the financial management of local authorities," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 12(7), pages 216-229, May.
    18. Constantine E. Kontokosta, 2016. "The Quantified Community and Neighborhood Labs: A Framework for Computational Urban Science and Civic Technology Innovation," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 67-84, October.
    19. Rob Kitchin, 2015. "Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 131-136.
    20. Lim Seng BOON & Jalaluddin Abdul MALEK & Mohd Yusof HUSSAIN & Zurinah TAHIR, 2020. "Understanding the trends and characteristics of smart urbanism across continents," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 4(1), pages 23-35, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3120-:d:515623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.