IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1047-d483754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nutrient Enriched Municipal Solid Waste Compost Increases Yield, Nutrient Content and Balance in Rice

Author

Listed:
  • Marufa Sultana

    (Soil Science Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh)

  • M. Jahiruddin

    (Department of Soil Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • M. Rafiqul Islam

    (Department of Soil Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • M. Mazibur Rahman

    (Department of Soil Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Md Anwarul Abedin

    (Department of Soil Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Zakaria M. Solaiman

    (UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, UWA Institute of Agriculture, M079, Perth, WA 6009, Australia)

Abstract

Globally a huge amount of municipal solid waste (MSW) is being produced which is very difficult to dispose. Composting of MSW is one of the options of solid waste recycling, but its use by the farmers is limited because of its low nutrient status. This study has considered some organic amendments to increase nutrient status of MSW compost for its potential use as an organic fertilizer in rice cultivation. We prepared three types of amended compost by mixing 20% mustard oil cake (MOC) and 30% poultry manure (PM) or cow dung (CD) or sugarcane press mud (SPM) with 50% MSW compost. The inoculum of Trichoderma viride was used to accelerate the composting process. The use of different amendments improved the nutrient level of MSW compost. A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the performances of amended MSW composts alone and in combination with chemical fertilizers on yield, nutrient content and balance in rice (var. BRRI dhan28). The experiment was conducted in 2018 at Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU) farm, Mymensingh having silt loam texture, pH in water of 6.7 and 2.79% organic matter; the soil was Aeric Haplaquept under the order Inceptisols. There were 10 treatments consisting of chemical fertilizers (urea, triple superphosphate, muriate of potash, gypsum and zinc sulphate) and four types of MSW compost (three amended and one unamended). Based on the results of yield and N, P, K and S concentration of rice grain, the treatment containing 50% fertilizers +10 t ha −1 of amended compost (MSW + MOC + SPM in a ratio of 5:2:3) performed the best. There were apparent negative balances for N (11–45 kg ha −1 ) and K (6–48 kg ha −1 ), and positive balances for P (8–71 kg ha −1 ) and S (4–46 kg ha −1 ) in soils, across the treatments. Results of this study have significant value in fertilizer management strategies for rice cultivation in sub-tropical countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Marufa Sultana & M. Jahiruddin & M. Rafiqul Islam & M. Mazibur Rahman & Md Anwarul Abedin & Zakaria M. Solaiman, 2021. "Nutrient Enriched Municipal Solid Waste Compost Increases Yield, Nutrient Content and Balance in Rice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1047-:d:483754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1047/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1047/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruei-Teng Lyu & Cheng-Hua Huang, 2022. "Supplementation of Manure Compost with Trichoderma asperellum Improves the Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Edible Amaranth under Field Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Juliet Kiiza Kabasiita & Emmanuel Opolot & Geoffrey Maxwell Malinga, 2022. "Quality and Fertility Assessments of Municipal Solid Waste Compost Produced from Cleaner Development Mechanism Compost Projects: A Case Study from Uganda," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1047-:d:483754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.