IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9938-d628958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iron and Aluminium Production Wastes as Exclusive Components of Alkali Activated Binders—Towards a Sustainable Alternative

Author

Listed:
  • Nuno Cristelo

    (CQ-VR, Department of Engineering, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Fernando Castro

    (Metrics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Tiago Miranda

    (ISISE, School of Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Zahra Abdollahnejad

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, CT 06269, USA)

  • Ana Fernández-Jiménez

    (Eduardo Torroja Institute for Construction Science (IETcc-C.S.I.C.), E28033 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The sustainability of resources is becoming a worldwide concern, including construction and building materials, especially with the alarming increase rate in global population. Alternative solutions to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) as a concrete binder are being studied, namely the so-called alkali-activated cements (AAC). These are less harmful to the environment, as lower CO 2 emissions are associated with their fabrication, and their mechanical properties can be similar to those of the OPC. The aim of developing alkali-activated materials (AAM) is the maximization of the incorporated recycled materials, which minimises the CO 2 emissions and cost, while also achieving acceptable properties for construction applications. Therefore, various efforts are being made to produce sustainable construction materials based on different sources and raw materials. Recently, significant attention has been raised from the by-products of the steelmaking industry, mostly due to their widespread availability. In this paper, ladle slag (LS) resulting from steelmaking operations was studied as the main precursor to produce AAC, combined with phosphating bath sludge—or phosphate sludge (PS)—and aluminium anodising sludge (AS), two by-products of the surface treatment of metals, in replacement rates of 10 and 20 wt.%. The precursors were activated by two different alkaline solutions: a combination of commercial sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate (COM), and a disposed solution from the cleaning of aluminium extrusion steel dies (CLE). This study assesses the influence of these by-products from the steelmaking industry (PS, AS and CLE) on the performance of the alkali-activated LS, and specifically on its fresh and hardened state properties, including rheology, heat of hydration, compressive strength and microstructure and mineralogy (X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy and Fourier transform infra-red. The results showed that the CLE had no negative impact on the strength of the AAM incorporating PS or/and AS, while increasing the strength of the LS alone by 2×. Additionally, regardless of the precursor combination, the use of a commercial activator (COM) led to more fluid pastes, compared with the CLE.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuno Cristelo & Fernando Castro & Tiago Miranda & Zahra Abdollahnejad & Ana Fernández-Jiménez, 2021. "Iron and Aluminium Production Wastes as Exclusive Components of Alkali Activated Binders—Towards a Sustainable Alternative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9938-:d:628958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9938/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9938/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Meng & Ziling Xu & Zeli Liu & Song Chen & Chen Wang & Ben Zhao & An Zhou, 2022. "Experimental Study on the Mechanics and Impact Resistance of Multiphase Lightweight Aggregate Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9938-:d:628958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.