IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7592-d589977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Is the Construction Industry Killing More Workers Than the Offshore Petroleum Industry in Occupational Accidents?

Author

Listed:
  • Kinga Wasilkiewicz Edwin

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Marie Nilsen

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Studio Apertura, NTNU Social Research, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Eirik Albrechtsen

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

In Norway, the fatal accident frequency per year is discernibly higher in the construction industry than in the petroleum industry. To probe the difference between the occupational safety levels in the two industries in Norway, semi-structured interviews with regulators, employer and employee organisations, company management, and safety personnel were conducted. This qualitative approach, together with factual industry information, offer invaluable insight on various elements influencing occupational safety. Rasmussen’s socio-technical model is used to sort the information and compare framework conditions, characteristics and aspects of the two industries influencing safety. Though the construction industry’s safety level has improved over the years, the results indicate that the petroleum industry’s safety level is still considered superior to its counterpart. The interviews point to major accidents and regulations as important for safety development in the petroleum industry. Thorough planning of operations, stricter rules, more standardised procedures and requirements, and fewer actors in the petroleum industry are also highlighted. The results of this study further reveal that safety in the construction industry has benefitted from safety developments in the petroleum industry. There is potential for more learning across the industries, in particular from petroleum to construction with regard to standardisation, barrier-thinking, and knowledge-sharing.

Suggested Citation

  • Kinga Wasilkiewicz Edwin & Marie Nilsen & Eirik Albrechtsen, 2021. "Why Is the Construction Industry Killing More Workers Than the Offshore Petroleum Industry in Occupational Accidents?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7592-:d:589977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milch, Vibeke & Laumann, Karin, 2019. "The influence of interorganizational factors on offshore incidents in the Norwegian petroleum industry: Challenges and future directions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 84-96.
    2. Patricia Carrillo, 2004. "Managing knowledge: lessons from the oil and gas sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 631-642.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Zhichen & Li, Ying & Zhang, Zhaoyi & Yu, Wenbo, 2022. "A new evacuation accessibility analysis approach based on spatial information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Kurtis Elton & S. Wolfe, 2012. "Water Efficiency and the Professional Plumbing Sector: How Capacity and Capability Influence Knowledge Acquisition and Innovation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(2), pages 595-608, January.
    3. IAIANI, Matteo & TUGNOLI, Alessandro & BONVICINI, Sarah & COZZANI, Valerio, 2021. "Analysis of Cybersecurity-related Incidents in the Process Industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Bugalia, Nikhil & Maemura, Yu & Ozawa, Kazumasa, 2021. "Characteristics of enhanced safety coordination between high-speed rail operators and manufacturers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Lam, C.Y. & Tai, K., 2020. "Network topological approach to modeling accident causations and characteristics: Analysis of railway incidents in Japan," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Rufaidah AlMaian & Amani Bu Qammaz, 2023. "The Organizational Learning Role in Construction Organizations Resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Naomi Brookes, 2012. "What is engineering construction and why is it important? Towards a research agenda," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 603-607, August.
    8. Iaiani, Matteo & Casson Moreno, Valeria & Reniers, Genserik & Tugnoli, Alessandro & Cozzani, Valerio, 2021. "Analysis of events involving the intentional release of hazardous substances from industrial facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Ghasemi, Behzad & Khalijian, Sadaf & Daim, Tugrul U. & Mohammadipirlar, Ebrahim, 2021. "Knowledge management performance measurement based on World-Class Competitive Advantages to develop strategic-oriented projects: Case of Iranian oil industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7592-:d:589977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.