IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6780-d575505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of a Football Competence Observation System (FOCOS), Linked to Procedural Tactical Knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Rubén Sánchez-López

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Ibon Echeazarra

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Julen Castellano

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

Abstract

The use of instruments for the evaluation of a player’s procedural tactical knowledge (PTK) in sociomotor sports, such as football, is a line of research of growing interest since it allows a pertinent description of the player’s football competence. The aim of this study is to configure and validate an ad-hoc observational tool that allows evaluating the player’s PTK, understood as football competence, from the observation, coding and recording of the roles, the actions of the acquired subroles and the operational and specific principles of football in the attack and defense phases. Based on the Delphi method, a field format coding instrument was designed and validated where each criterion is a system of categories, exhaustive and mutually exclusive. The results showed excellent content validity (9.02 out of 10), and high values of intra-observer stability (k = 0.747) and inter-observer agreement (k = 0.665). Generalizability analysis showed an excellent reliability (G = 0.99). Additionally, the construct validity of the tool was calculated through a small-sided game Gk + 4v4 + Gk, using two independent samples: semi-professional and amateur players. The results reflected significant differences (α < 0.05) between both samples in the variables total score, offensive score and defensive score. Therefore, this study provides a valid and reliable instrument that allows data collection in a rigorous and pertinent way, as well as their analysis and evaluation in attack and defense according to the roles of the players and based on the motor behaviors that they perform using the subroles that they acquired, associated with the technical dimension, along with the principles that they develop in parallel, in support of the tactical dimension.

Suggested Citation

  • Rubén Sánchez-López & Ibon Echeazarra & Julen Castellano, 2021. "Validation of a Football Competence Observation System (FOCOS), Linked to Procedural Tactical Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6780-:d:575505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6780/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6780/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haydée Agras & Carmen Ferragut & J. Arturo Abraldes, 2016. "Match analysis in futsal: a systematic review," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 652-686, August.
    2. Javier Courel-Ibáñez & Allistair P. McRobert & Enrique Ortega Toro & David Cárdenas Vélez, 2017. "Collective behaviour in basketball: a systematic review," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1-2), pages 44-64, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rubén Sánchez-López & Ibon Echeazarra & Julen Castellano, 2022. "Systematic review of declarative tactical knowledge evaluation tools based on game-play scenarios in soccer," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2157-2176, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Antúnez & Sergio J. Ibáñez & Sebastian Feu, 2021. "Analysis of the Research Methodology in Spanish Doctoral Theses on Handball. A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Amel Tayech & Mohamed Arbi Mejri & Issam Makhlouf & Ameni Mathlouthi & David G. Behm & Anis Chaouachi, 2020. "Second Wave of COVID-19 Global Pandemic and Athletes’ Confinement: Recommendations to Better Manage and Optimize the Modified Lifestyle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-12, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6780-:d:575505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.