IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5969-d562129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Durability Performance Evaluation of Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete

Author

Listed:
  • Salmabanu Luhar

    (Frederick Research Center, P.O. Box 24729, Nicosia 1303, Cyprus
    Department of Civil Engineering, Frederick University, Nicosia 1036, Cyprus
    Center of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology, School of Materials Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Perlis 01000, Malaysia)

  • Ismail Luhar

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Shri Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibrewala University, Rajasthan 333001, India)

  • Demetris Nicolaides

    (Frederick Research Center, P.O. Box 24729, Nicosia 1303, Cyprus
    Department of Civil Engineering, Frederick University, Nicosia 1036, Cyprus)

  • Rajesh Gupta

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Rajasthan 302017, India)

Abstract

Unfortunately, the production of cement impacts pessimistically on environments since it emits CO 2 —a principal Green House Gas (GHG)—encouraging the earth-heating dilemma. Moreover, it necessitates not only high temperature produced by the devouring of narrow natural mineral coal resources to obtain very high amounts of energy, but it also gulps down natural limestone deposits as a raw material that is found confined in nature to obtain intense energy. Quite recently, geopolymerisation—an exothermic process, through which geopolymeric binders can be produced by synthesis of a pozzolanic precursor rich in Alumina and Silica, for an instant, Fly Ash, with alkali solution for activation in an alkali medium at a low temperature and low operational energy—is recognized as a brilliantly promising alternative to conventional cement. That means, no elevated temperature and higher energy consuming reactions are essential any more as found associated with contemporary cement production. This research paper moves towards fulfilling the performance evaluation of durability studies viz., water permeability, sorptivity, sulphate resistance, acid resistance, salt resistance, chloride diffusion, drying shrinkage, and corrosion of fly ash based user and eco-friendly rubberized (containing rubber tyre fibres) geopolymer concrete. Comparisons of the outcomes have been made with its counterpart, which has unearthed that Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete proved to better concerning all the above-mentioned parameters than Rubberized OPC-Concrete.

Suggested Citation

  • Salmabanu Luhar & Ismail Luhar & Demetris Nicolaides & Rajesh Gupta, 2021. "Durability Performance Evaluation of Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5969-:d:562129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5969/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5969/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yarivan J. Zrar & Khaleel H. Younis, 2022. "Mechanical and Durability Properties of Self-Compacted Concrete Incorporating Waste Crumb Rubber as Sand Replacement: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-39, September.
    2. Oluwapelumi Abiodun & Charles Kabubo & Raphael Mutuku & Obuks Ejohwomu, 2023. "The Effect of Pristine Graphene on the Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Mortar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Sherif H. Helmy & Ahmed M. Tahwia & Mohamed G. Mahdy & Mohamed Abd Elrahman & Mohammed A. Abed & Osama Youssf, 2023. "The Use of Recycled Tire Rubber, Crushed Glass, and Crushed Clay Brick in Lightweight Concrete Production: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-41, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5969-:d:562129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.