IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2949-d342568.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Assessment of Analytical Fate and Transport Models of Organic Contaminants in Unsaturated Soils

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Grazia Stoppiello

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy)

  • Giusy Lofrano

    (Department of Chemical and Biology, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy
    Centro Servizi Metrologici e Tecnologici Avanzati (CeSMA), University of Naples “Federico II”, via Cinthia ed. 7, 80126 Naples, Italy)

  • Maurizio Carotenuto

    (Department of Chemical and Biology, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy)

  • Giacomo Viccione

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy)

  • Claudio Guarnaccia

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy)

  • Leonardo Cascini

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy)

Abstract

Analytical models for the simulation of contaminants’ fate and transport in the unsaturated zone are used in many engineering applications concerning groundwater resource management and risk assessment. As a consequence, several scientific studies dealing with the development and application of analytical solutions have been carried out. Six models have been selected and compared based on common characteristics to identify pros and cons as well as to highlight any difference in the final output. The analyzed models have been clustered into three groups according to the assumptions on contaminant source and physico-chemical mechanisms occurring during the transport. Comparative simulations were carried out with five target contaminants (Benzene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Vinyl Chloride, Trichloroethylene and Aldrin) with different decay’s coefficient, three types of soil (sand, loam and clay) and three different thicknesses of the contaminant source. The calculated concentration at a given depth in the soil for the same contamination scenario varied greatly among the models. A significant variability of the concentrations was shown due to the variation of contaminant and soil characteristics. As a general finding, the more advanced is the model, the lower the predicted concentrations; thus, models that are too simplified could lead to outcomes of some orders of magnitude greater than the advanced one.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Grazia Stoppiello & Giusy Lofrano & Maurizio Carotenuto & Giacomo Viccione & Claudio Guarnaccia & Leonardo Cascini, 2020. "A Comparative Assessment of Analytical Fate and Transport Models of Organic Contaminants in Unsaturated Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2949-:d:342568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2949/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2949/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Foster & Ricardo Hirata & Daniel Gomes & Monica D'Elia & Marta Paris, 2002. "Groundwater Quality Protection : A Guide for Water Utilities, Municipal Authorities, and Environment Agencies," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13843, December.
    2. Ettore Trulli & Cristiana Morosini & Elena C. Rada & Vincenzo Torretta, 2016. "Remediation in Situ of Hydrocarbons by Combined Treatment in a Contaminated Alluvial Soil due to an Accidental Spill of LNAPL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abhay Guleria & Pankaj Kumar Gupta & Sumedha Chakma & Brijesh Kumar Yadav, 2023. "Unraveling the Fate and Transport of DNAPLs in Heterogeneous Aquifer Systems—A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Abhishek Sanskrityayn & Heejun Suk & Jui-Sheng Chen & Eungyu Park, 2021. "Generalized Analytical Solutions of The Advection-Dispersion Equation with Variable Flow and Transport Coefficients," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Alvarado & M. Esteller & E. Quentin & J. Expósito, 2016. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and GIS Approach for Prioritization of Drinking Water Utilities Protection Based on their Vulnerability to Contamination," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1549-1566, March.
    2. Ali El-Naqa & Ammar Al-Shayeb, 2009. "Groundwater Protection and Management Strategy in Jordan," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(12), pages 2379-2394, September.
    3. Diana Mariana Cocârţă & Mihaela Alexandra Stoian & Aykan Karademir, 2017. "Crude Oil Contaminated Sites: Evaluation by Using Risk Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Yasmin Rajkumar & Yongxin Xu, 2011. "Protection of Borehole Water Quality in Sub-Saharan Africa using Minimum Safe Distances and Zonal Protection," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(13), pages 3413-3425, October.
    5. M. Chitsazan & Y. Akhtari, 2009. "A GIS-based DRASTIC Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Kherran Plain, Khuzestan, Iran," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(6), pages 1137-1155, April.
    6. A. Alvarado & M. V. Esteller & E. Quentin & J. L. Expósito, 2016. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and GIS Approach for Prioritization of Drinking Water Utilities Protection Based on their Vulnerability to Contamination," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1549-1566, March.
    7. Laijun Zhao & Ying Qian & Qing-Mi Hu & Ran Jiang & Meiting Li & Xulei Wang, 2018. "An Analysis of Hazardous Chemical Accidents in China between 2006 and 2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Jaco Nel & Yongxin Xu & Okke Batelaan & Luc Brendonck, 2009. "Benefit and Implementation of Groundwater Protection Zoning in South Africa," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(14), pages 2895-2911, November.
    9. Jose Expósito & Maria Esteller & Jorge Paredes & Celso Rico & Roberto Franco, 2010. "Groundwater Protection Using Vulnerability Maps and Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA): A Case Study in Mexico," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(15), pages 4219-4236, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2949-:d:342568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.