IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2374-d333969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Enhance the Environmental Values of Contemporary Cemeteries in an Urban Context

Author

Listed:
  • Długozima Anna

    (Department of Landscape Art, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Warsaw, Nowoursynowska 166 St., 02 787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Kosiacka-Beck Ewa

    (Department of Landscape Art, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Warsaw, Nowoursynowska 166 St., 02 787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The cemetery is an important element of the city’s natural system. It can create a system that has a great impact on shaping the city’s climate if it is integrated with the local landscape, designed with respect for the natural environment along with other green areas. In the face of negative demographic forecasts, urbanization and suburbanization processes, and climate change, the use of pro-environmental solutions in the development of cemeteries cannot be overestimated. On the basis of analyses of contemporary cemeteries from Europe (78 objects), including Poland (8 objects), a catalog of pro-environmental solutions is developed. The catalog is created based on the proposed functional and spatial model of cemeteries as a multifunctional space, integrating natural and cultural environments. Environmental activities related to the context, burial space, architecture, and other spatial elements, as well as the vegetation of modern cemeteries, are included. Then, in order to increase the environmental values of the cemetery, these solutions were implemented by developing an integrated concept for the project of a multifunctional and ecological municipal cemetery in Gniezno, Poland (the Greater Poland voivodeship).

Suggested Citation

  • Długozima Anna & Kosiacka-Beck Ewa, 2020. "How to Enhance the Environmental Values of Contemporary Cemeteries in an Urban Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2374-:d:333969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2374/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2374/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margrete Skår & Helena Nordh & Grete Swensen, 2018. "Green urban cemeteries: more than just parks," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 362-382, July.
    2. Stefano Capolongo & Leopoldo Sdino & Marta Dell’Ovo & Rossella Moioli & Stefano Della Torre, 2019. "How to Assess Urban Regeneration Proposals by Considering Conflicting Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Brent F. Nelsen & James L. Guth, 2016. "Religion and the Creation of European Identity: The Message of the Flags," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 80-88, March.
    4. Carlton Basmajian & Christopher Coutts, 2010. "Planning for the Disposal of the Dead," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 305-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuo-Hsien Lee & Chung-Chen Huang & Sophia Chuang & Cheng-Tsu Huang & Wen-Hsien Tsai & Chu-Lun Hsieh, 2022. "Energy Saving and Carbon Neutrality in the Funeral Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Krzysztof Herman & Łukasz Drozda, 2021. "Green Infrastructure in the Time of Social Distancing: Urban Policy and the Tactical Pandemic Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Ágnes Sallay & Zsuzsanna Mikházi & Imola Gecséné Tar & Katalin Takács, 2022. "Cemeteries as a Part of Green Infrastructure and Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allam, Zaheer, 2019. "The city of the living or the dead: On the ethics and morality of land use for graveyards in a rapidly urbanised world," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Dolls, Mathias, 2024. "An unemployment re-insurance scheme for the eurozone? Stabilizing and redistributive effects," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Marco Gola & Marta Dell’Ovo & Stefano Scalone & Stefano Capolongo, 2022. "Adaptive Reuse of Social and Healthcare Structures: The Case Study as a Research Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Riccardo Scalenghe & Ottorino-Luca Pantani, 2019. "Connecting Existing Cemeteries Saving Good Soils (for Livings)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Andrzej Długoński & Diana Dushkova & Dagmar Haase, 2022. "Urban Cemeteries—Places of Multiple Diversity and Challenges. A Case Study from Łódź (Poland) and Leipzig (Germany)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Petio, Maxwell Kwotua, 2023. "Reflections on urbanisation, land supply and the Ghanaian physical planning system towards sustaining cemetery land use in Greater Kumasi Metropolitan Area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Bingni Deng & Julia Affolderbach & Pauline Deutz, 2020. "Industrial Restructuring through Eco-Transformation: Green Industrial Transfer in Changsha–Zhuzhou–Xiangtan, Hunan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Sarah Ciaglia & Clemens Fuest & Friedrich Heinemann, 2018. "What a feeling?! How to promote ‘European Identity’," EconPol Policy Reports 9, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    9. Alexis D. Smith & Emily Minor, 2019. "Chicago’s Urban Cemeteries as Habitat for Cavity-Nesting Birds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo, 2021. "The Assessment of Density Bonus in Building Renovation Interventions. The Case of the City of Florence in Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Eglė Klumbytė & Raimondas Bliūdžius & Milena Medineckienė & Paris A. Fokaides, 2021. "An MCDM Model for Sustainable Decision-Making in Municipal Residential Buildings Facilities Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Maria LopezDeAsiain & Vicente Díaz-García, 2020. "The Importance of the Participatory Dimension in Urban Resilience Improvement Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo & Fabiana Forte, 2020. "A Methodological Approach for the Assessment of Potentially Buildable Land for Tax Purposes: The Italian Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm, 2022. "Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-88, February.
    15. Marco Rossitti & Alessandra Oppio & Francesca Torrieri, 2021. "The Financial Sustainability of Cultural Heritage Reuse Projects: An Integrated Approach for the Historical Rural Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Martina Carra & Barbara Caselli & Silvia Rossetti & Michele Zazzi, 2023. "Widespread Urban Regeneration of Existing Residential Areas in European Medium-Sized Cities—A Framework to Locate Redevelopment Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Wang, Hao & Zhao, Yizhu & Gao, Xichen & Gao, Boyang, 2021. "Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Marco Trisciuoglio & Michela Barosio & Ana Ricchiardi & Zeynep Tulumen & Martina Crapolicchio & Rossella Gugliotta, 2021. "Transitional Morphologies and Urban Forms: Generation and Regeneration Processes—An Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Ti-Ching Peng & Ying-Hui Chiang, 2015. "The non-linearity of hospitals' proximity on property prices: experiences from Taipei, Taiwan," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 341-361, December.
    20. Nalle, Victor Imanuel W. & Moeliono, Tristam Pascal, 2023. "Spatial injustice in the context of cemeteries: The case of Surabaya, Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2374-:d:333969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.