IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1308-d319241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seismic Risk Assessment Using Stochastic Nonlinear Models

Author

Listed:
  • Yeudy F. Vargas-Alzate

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), Building D2, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Nieves Lantada

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), Building D2, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Ramón González-Drigo

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), Building D2, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Luis G. Pujades

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), Building D2, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

The basic input when seismic risk is estimated in urban environments is the expected physical damage level of buildings. The vulnerability index and capacity spectrum-based methods are the tools that have been used most to estimate the probability of occurrence of this important variable. Although both methods provide adequate estimates, they involve simplifications that are no longer necessary, given the current capacity of computers. In this study, an advanced method is developed that avoids many of these simplifications. The method starts from current state-of-the-art approaches, but it incorporates non-linear dynamic analysis and a probabilistic focus. Thus, the method considers not only the nonlinear dynamic response of the structures, modeled as multi degree of freedom systems (MDoF), but also uncertainties related to the loads, the geometry of the buildings, the mechanical properties of the materials and the seismic action. Once the method has been developed, the buildings are subjected to earthquake records that are selected and scaled according to the seismic hazard of the site and considering the probabilistic nature of the seismic actions. The practical applications of the method are illustrated with a case study: framed reinforced concrete buildings that are typical of an important district, the Eixample , in Barcelona (Spain). The building typology and the district were chosen because the seismic risk in Barcelona has been thoroughly studied, so detailed information about buildings’ features, seismic hazard and expected risk is available. Hence, the current results can be compared with those obtained using simpler, less sophisticated methods. The main aspects of the method are presented and discussed first. Then, the case study is described and the results obtained with the capacity spectrum method are compared with the results using the approach presented here. The results at hand show reasonably good agreement with previous seismic damage and risk scenarios in Barcelona, but the new method provides richer, more detailed, more reliable information. This is particularly useful for seismic risk reduction, prevention and management, to move towards more resilient, sustainable cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeudy F. Vargas-Alzate & Nieves Lantada & Ramón González-Drigo & Luis G. Pujades, 2020. "Seismic Risk Assessment Using Stochastic Nonlinear Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1308-:d:319241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1308/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1308/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nieves Lantada & Luis Pujades & Alex Barbat, 2009. "Vulnerability index and capacity spectrum based methods for urban seismic risk evaluation. A comparison," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 51(3), pages 501-524, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoming Lei & Limin Sun & Ye Xia & Tiantao He, 2020. "Vibration-Based Seismic Damage States Evaluation for Regional Concrete Beam Bridges Using Random Forest Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Eliana Fischer & Alessio Emanuele Biondo & Annalisa Greco & Francesco Martinico & Alessandro Pluchino & Andrea Rapisarda, 2022. "Objective and Perceived Risk in Seismic Vulnerability Assessment at an Urban Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Eliana Fischer & Giovanni Barreca & Annalisa Greco & Francesco Martinico & Alessandro Pluchino & Andrea Rapisarda, 2023. "Seismic risk assessment of a large metropolitan area by means of simulated earthquakes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(1), pages 117-153, August.
    4. Nurullah Bektaş & Orsolya Kegyes-Brassai, 2022. "Conventional RVS Methods for Seismic Risk Assessment for Estimating the Current Situation of Existing Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-40, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Armando Aguilar-Meléndez & Lluis G. Pujades & Alex H. Barbat & Marisol Monterrubio-Velasco & Josep Puente & Nieves Lantada, 2022. "Comparative analysis of a new assessment of the seismic risk of residential buildings of two districts of Barcelona," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 1649-1691, February.
    2. Maurizio Pollino & Grazia Fattoruso & Luigi La Porta & Antonio Bruno Della Rocca & Valentina James, 2012. "Collaborative Open Source Geospatial Tools and Maps Supporting the Response Planning to Disastrous Earthquake Events," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Jairo Valcárcel & Miguel Mora & Omar Cardona & Lluis Pujades & Alex Barbat & Gabriel Bernal, 2013. "Methodology and applications for the benefit cost analysis of the seismic risk reduction in building portfolios at broadscale," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 845-868, October.
    4. Mabel Marulanda & Martha Carreño & Omar Cardona & Mario Ordaz & Alex Barbat, 2013. "Probabilistic earthquake risk assessment using CAPRA: application to the city of Barcelona, Spain," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 59-84, October.
    5. A. Castillo & F. López-Almansa & L. Pujades, 2011. "Seismic risk analysis of urban non-engineered buildings: application to an informal settlement in Mérida, Venezuela," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(2), pages 891-916, November.
    6. Mauro Niño & Miguel Jaimes & Eduardo Reinoso, 2015. "A risk index due to natural hazards based on the expected annual loss," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(1), pages 215-236, October.
    7. Mohammad Ghobadi & Davood Fereidooni, 2012. "Seismic hazard assessment of the city of Hamedan and its vicinity, west of Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 63(2), pages 1025-1038, September.
    8. Livio Pedone & Simona Bianchi & Sonia Giovinazzi & Stefano Pampanin, 2022. "A Framework and Tool for Knowledge-Based Seismic Risk Assessment of School Buildings: SLaMA-School," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1308-:d:319241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.