IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p885-d312774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating with Authenticity to Ensure Sustainability of Traditional Cultural Festivals: Residents’ Perspectives about Macao’s Drunken Dragon Festival

Author

Listed:
  • Suh-hee Choi

    (Department of Geography, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea
    Macao Institute for Tourism Studies, Colina de Mong-Há, Macao S.A.R. 999078, China)

  • Sharif Shams Imon

    (Macao Institute for Tourism Studies, Colina de Mong-Há, Macao S.A.R. 999078, China)

  • Ubaldino Couto

    (Macao Institute for Tourism Studies, Colina de Mong-Há, Macao S.A.R. 999078, China)

Abstract

The present study examines the three perceptual factors (cultural, economic, and social) that affect residents’ attitude towards transformation in the search for sustainability. Macao’s Drunken Dragon Festival, China’s intangible cultural heritage, was used as the case. Self-administered surveys were conducted on 378 resident festival participants in 2015 and 692 residents (both participants and non-participants) in 2017. The results show that regardless of previous experiences of participating in the festival, those who perceive more strongly about its cultural values tend to have positive attitudes towards its transformation, which may involve a loss of objective authenticity. Those who perceive more strongly that the festival is exclusive and does not embrace diverse participants are more likely to support its transformation. However, such a perception does not lead to their belief that diverse groups of people should be incorporated into the festival. Only among the non-participants from the sample collected in 2017, the perception that this festival provides economic benefit is associated with positive attitudes towards transforming and incorporating diverse groups of participants. This study provides insight into understanding the residents’ common and differentiated attitudes with regards to how much transformation is necessary to ensure sustainability of a local traditional cultural festival.

Suggested Citation

  • Suh-hee Choi & Sharif Shams Imon & Ubaldino Couto, 2020. "Negotiating with Authenticity to Ensure Sustainability of Traditional Cultural Festivals: Residents’ Perspectives about Macao’s Drunken Dragon Festival," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:885-:d:312774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weaver, David B. & Lawton, Laura J., 2013. "Resident perceptions of a contentious tourism event," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 165-175.
    2. Lee, Insun & Arcodia, Charles & Lee, Timothy Jeonglyeol, 2012. "Benefits of visiting a multicultural festival: The case of South Korea," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 334-340.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dong-Han Kim & Jun-Jae Lee & Hyo-Yeun Park, 2021. "Assessing Economic Value of Local Festivals for Sustainable Development: A Case of Yeongju Korean Seonbi Culture Festival," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Dawei Li & Shangyi Zhou, 2021. "Evaluating the Authenticity of Naxi Music in Three Stages from the Perspective of Naxi Musicians: An Application of Lacan’s Mirror Stage Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Getz, Donald & Page, Stephen J., 2016. "Progress and prospects for event tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 593-631.
    2. Mao, Luke Lunhua & Huang, Haiyan, 2016. "Social impact of Formula One Chinese Grand Prix: A comparison of local residents’ perceptions based on the intrinsic dimension," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 306-318.
    3. Suess, Courtney & Mody, Makarand, 2016. "Gaming can be sustainable too! Using Social Representation Theory to examine the moderating effects of tourism diversification on residents' tax paying behavior," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 20-39.
    4. Xieyang Chen & Xingmin Shi, 2021. "Support or against coal mining? Host community perceptions of coal mining: a cluster analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 6819-6837, May.
    5. Mike Peters & Chung-Shing Chan & Anita Legerer, 2018. "Local Perception of Impact-Attitudes-Actions towards Tourism Development in the Urlaubsregion Murtal in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, July.
    6. Renuka Mahadevan, 2017. "Going beyond the economic impact of a regional folk festival for tourism," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(4), pages 744-755, June.
    7. Qiu, Richard T.R. & Park, Jinah & Li, ShiNa & Song, Haiyan, 2020. "Social costs of tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Ryohei Yamashita, 2021. "Saving tradition in Japan: a case study of local opinions regarding urban university students’ participation in rural festivals," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 125-147, February.
    9. Huan Sun & Shaofeng Wu & Yanning Li & Guangquan Dai, 2019. "Tourist-to-Tourist Interaction at Festivals: A Grounded Theory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Habib Alipour & Hamed Fatemi & Nahid Malazizi, 2020. "Is Edu-Tourism a Sustainable Option? A Case Study of Residents’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, July.
    11. María Dolores Sánchez-Fernández & Daniel Álvarez-Bassi & José Ramón-Cardona, 2019. "Environmental and Economic Concerns in Residents’ Attitudes in Punta del Este (Uruguay)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Yolal, Medet & Gursoy, Dogan & Uysal, Muzaffer & Kim, Hyelin (Lina) & Karacaoğlu, Sıla, 2016. "Impacts of festivals and events on residents’ well-being," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-18.
    13. José Ramón-Cardona & David Daniel Peña-Miranda & María Dolores Sánchez-Fernández, 2021. "Acceptance of Tourist Offers and Territory: Cluster Analysis of Ibiza Residents (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Davis, Andrew, 2016. "Experiential places or places of experience? Place identity and place attachment as mechanisms for creating festival environment," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 49-61.
    15. Shakeela, Aishath & Weaver, David, 2018. "“Managed evils” of hedonistic tourism in the Maldives: Islamic social representations and their mediation of local social exchange," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 13-24.
    16. Bhati, Abhishek & Pearce, Philip, 2017. "Tourist attractions in Bangkok and Singapore; linking vandalism and setting characteristics," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 15-30.
    17. Yong-Guang Zou & Fang Meng & Ningqiao Li & Enling Pu, 2021. "Ethnic minority cultural festival experience: Visitor–environment fit, cultural contact, and behavioral intention," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(6), pages 1237-1255, September.
    18. Cardona José Ramón & Sánchez-Fernández María Dolores, 2017. "Nightlife sector from a gender point of view: The case of Ibiza," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 51-64, May.
    19. Musallam Abedtalas & Lokman Tobrak & SadÄk Sercek, 2016. "The Factors of Residents' Support for Sustainable Tourism Development," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(5), pages 133-145.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:885-:d:312774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.