IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9381-d443366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks and Soil Quality in an Area Cultivated with Guinea Grass under the Residual Effect of Nitrogen Doses

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel

    (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil)

  • Gelson dos Santos Difante

    (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil)

  • Alexandre Romeiro de Araujo

    (Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande 79106-550, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil)

  • Denise Baptaglin Montagner

    (Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande 79106-550, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil)

  • Valeria Pacheco Batista Euclides

    (Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande 79106-550, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil)

  • Manoel Gustavo Paranhos da Silva

    (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil)

Abstract

This study examines the residual effect of nitrogen (N) doses on the carbon (C) and N stocks and on soil quality in an area cultivated with guinea grass. The pastures received three annual doses of N (100, 200 and 300 kg ha −1 ) from 2015 to 2017. In 2018, N fertilization was not applied so the residual effect of the nutrient could be characterized. Soil chemical attributes, C and N stocks, density and penetration resistance and root system characteristics were evaluated at different depths. No difference was observed between the N doses for soil density, which averaged 1.22 and 1.25 g cm −3 under and between the tussocks of guinea grass, respectively. Penetration resistance was affected by the N doses post-grazing, with the highest value (1.9 MPa) observed in pastures that received 300 kg ha −1 of N for three consecutive years. Root dry mass was not affected by the N doses. There was no effect of N doses on the average (19.7 mg ha −1 ) or total (134.3 mg ha −1 ) C stock in the soil. The total N stock did not change (11.3 mg ha −1 ) in response to the N doses; however, the average N stock was higher in the soil cultivated with guinea grass under the N dose of 300 kg ha −1 (1.7 mg ha −1 ). The N doses had little interference with the soil chemical and physical aspects. Regardless of the dose, high C and N stocks were observed in the soil cultivated with guinea grass. Therefore, when properly managed, intensive pasture-based animal production systems become important allies of the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel & Gelson dos Santos Difante & Alexandre Romeiro de Araujo & Denise Baptaglin Montagner & Valeria Pacheco Batista Euclides & Manoel Gustavo Paranhos da Silva, 2020. "Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks and Soil Quality in an Area Cultivated with Guinea Grass under the Residual Effect of Nitrogen Doses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9381-:d:443366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9381/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raúl Lorenzo González Marcillo & Walter Efraín Castro Guamàn & Angela Edith Guerrero Pincay & Plutarco Antonio Vera Zambrano & Nelson René Ortiz Naveda & Santiago Alexander Guamàn Rivera, 2021. "Assessment of Guinea Grass Panicum maximum under Silvopastoral Systems in Combination with Two Management Systems in Orellana Province, Ecuador," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9381-:d:443366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.