IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9178-d440052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Scientific Approach to the Densification Debate in Bergen Centre in Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Remco Elric de Koning

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway)

  • Hans Jacob Roald

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway)

  • Akkelies van Nes

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway
    Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture, TU-Delft, BL Delft 2628, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The municipality of Bergen in Norway aims to densify fifty per cent of new housing within the city’s central parts. The Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation ordered and financed an investigation to be carried out by the Western Norway University of Applied Sciences and the consulting firm Asplan Viak to give research-based input to the densification strategy debate in Bergen. This article demonstrates how the Space Syntax method can be applied to urban densification strategies in urban planning and policy making. The Geographical Information System (GIS) is used to obtain, select, and aggregate operational information. First, the spatial attributes that constitute an area’s attractiveness were registered. Then, this analysis was modelled after the Spacescape ® method. Next, the Space Syntax methodology was applied to predict to-movement and through-movement flow potentials. Finally, through weighting the relevant parameters, including impediments such as land ownership, twelve areas were identified as having major potential for transformation based on their overall score. As it turns out, the spatial structure of the street and road network is the underlying driver for how and where to densify. Now, the challenge is how to apply this knowledge into current planning practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Remco Elric de Koning & Hans Jacob Roald & Akkelies van Nes, 2020. "A Scientific Approach to the Densification Debate in Bergen Centre in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9178-:d:440052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim Dovey & Elek Pafka, 2017. "What is functional mix? An assemblage approach," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 249-267, April.
    2. Akkelies van Nes & Claudia Yamu, 2020. "Exploring Challenges in Space Syntax Theory Building: The Use of Positivist and Hermeneutic Explanatory Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Yamu & Akkelies van Nes & Chiara Garau, 2021. "Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Eda Ustaoglu & Chris Jacobs-Crisioni, 2022. "What Drives Residential Land Expansion and Densification? An Analysis of Growing and Shrinking Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Akkelies van Nes, 2021. "Spatial Configurations and Walkability Potentials. Measuring Urban Compactness with Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Likun Wu & Wei Lang & Tingting Chen, 2024. "Deciphering Urban Land Use Patterns in the Shenzhen–Dongguan Cross-Boundary Region Based on Multisource Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Kim Dovey & Elek Pafka, 2020. "What is walkability? The urban DMA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 93-108, January.
    3. Lamprecht Mariusz, 2022. "Space syntax as a socio-economic approach: a review of potentials in the polish context," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 5-14, January.
    4. Francesc Valls & Josep Roca, 2021. "Visualizing Digital Traces for Sustainable Urban Management: Mapping Tourism Activity on the Virtual Public Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Remco de Koning & Wendy Guan Zhen Tan & Akkelies van Nes, 2020. "Assessing Spatial Configurations and Transport Energy Usage for Planning Sustainable Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Kim Dovey & Ian Woodcock & Lucinda Pike, 2017. "Isochrone Mapping of Urban Transport: Car-dependency, Mode-choice and Design Research," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 402-416, August.
    7. Walid-Mahfoud Djenaihi & Noureddine Zemmouri & Moussadek Djenane & Akkelies van Nes, 2021. "Noise and Spatial Configuration in Biskra, Algeria—A Space Syntax Approach to Understand the Built Environment for Visually Impaired People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Yuchen Qin & Yikang Zhang & Minfeng Yao & Qiwei Chen, 2023. "How to Measure the Impact of Walking Accessibility of Suburban Rail Station Catchment Areas on the Commercial Premium Benefits of Joint Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.
    9. Akkelies van Nes, 2021. "Spatial Configurations and Walkability Potentials. Measuring Urban Compactness with Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Zhi Qiu & Yi Hua & Binwei Yun & Zhu Wang & Yi Zhou, 2023. "Public Space Planning in Urban Resettlement Community in China: Addressing Diverse Needs of Rural Migrants through Function Programming Based on Architectural Planning Theory," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Elek Pafka & Kim Dovey & Gideon DPA Aschwanden, 2020. "Limits of space syntax for urban design: Axiality, scale and sinuosity," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 508-522, March.
    12. Kestutis Zaleckis & Szymon Chmielewski & Jūratė Kamičaitytė & Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske & Halina Lipińska, 2022. "Walkability Compass—A Space Syntax Solution for Comparative Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Akkelies van Nes, 2021. "The Impact of the Ring Roads on the Location Pattern of Shops in Town and City Centres. A Space Syntax Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Xuanxuan Xia & Kexin Lin & Yang Ding & Xianlei Dong & Huijun Sun & Beibei Hu, 2020. "Research on the Coupling Coordination Relationships between Urban Function Mixing Degree and Urbanization Development Level Based on Information Entropy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Liu Liu & Huang Huang & Jiaxin Qi, 2024. "Towards a Multi-Scale Effect of Land Mixed Use on Resident Population—A Novel Explanatory Framework of Interactive Spatial Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Zhou, Xingang & Yeh, Anthony G.O. & Yue, Yang & Li, Weifeng, 2022. "Residential-employment mixed use and jobs-housing balance: A case study of Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Hurlimann, Anna & Moosavi, Sareh & Browne, Geoffrey R., 2021. "Urban planning policy must do more to integrate climate change adaptation and mitigation actions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Hanbing Yang & Meichen Fu & Li Wang & Feng Tang, 2021. "Mixed Land Use Evaluation and Its Impact on Housing Prices in Beijing Based on Multi-Source Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Gerhard JB Bruyns & Christopher D Higgins & Darren H Nel, 2021. "Urban volumetrics: From vertical to volumetric urbanisation and its extensions to empirical morphological analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(5), pages 922-940, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9178-:d:440052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.