IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p8860-d434609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception-Based Study on the Value of Nature to People and Land Sparing for Nature in Brazil and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka E. Latawiec

    (Department of Geography and Environment, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22453900, Brazil
    International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro 22460-320, Brazil
    Department of Production Engineering, Logistics and Applied Computer Science, Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków 30-149, Poland
    School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK)

  • Rodrigo Penna-Firme

    (Department of Geography and Environment, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22453900, Brazil)

  • Ingrid A.B. Pena

    (Department of Geography and Environment, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22453900, Brazil
    International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro 22460-320, Brazil)

  • Bernardo B.N. Strassburg

    (Department of Geography and Environment, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22453900, Brazil
    International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro 22460-320, Brazil
    Programa de Pós Graduacão em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-590, Brazil
    Botanical Garden Research Institute of Rio de Janeiro, R. Jardim Botânico 1008, Rio de Janeiro-RJ 22460-030, Brazil)

  • Adam Drosik

    (Institute of Political Science and Administration, Opole University, Opole 45-040, Poland)

  • Maciej Kubon

    (Department of Production Engineering, Logistics and Applied Computer Science, Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków 30-149, Poland
    Eastern European State College of Higher Education in Przemyśl, Przemyśl 37-700, Poland)

  • Hubert Latala

    (Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków 30-149, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Grotkiewicz

    (Department of Production Engineering, Logistics and Applied Computer Science, Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków 30-149, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Kubon

    (Association Project Tarnów, Rynek 9, 33-100 Tarnów, Poland
    Institute of Political Science and International Relations, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, ul. Jabłonowskich 5, 31-114 Krakow, Poland)

  • Pedro Teixeira

    (Department of Education, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, 22453900, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

  • Lucas Rodrigues

    (Department of Earth System Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA)

  • Alvaro Iribarrem

    (International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro 22460-320, Brazil)

  • Stanisław Famielec

    (Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków 30-149, Poland)

  • Dominika Springer

    (Institute of Political Science and Administration, Opole University, Opole 45-040, Poland)

  • Isabella Leite Lucas

    (International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro 22460-320, Brazil)

Abstract

Understanding perception about nature is paramount to understanding human behavior and decision making on the environment. We performed a survey-based study in Brazil and Poland to better understand the perception of land sparing for nature and the perceived value of nature. The countries were selected by intentional sampling and given their importance for local and global biodiversity conservation, and complex socio-ecological context of conservation versus agroforestry business. We performed an online questionnaire (N = 1030) in Brazil and face-to-face interviews in Poland (N = 322). We found that Brazilian respondents demonstrated more pro-environmental attitudes than Polish survey participants. Regarding the question: “How much nature that is left should be spared?”, nearly 51% of Brazilians answered “everything”, compared with 13% of Polish respondents. Just under half of the respondents from Poland (45.6%) indicated that half of the nature that is left should be spared. Brazilian respondents also perceived the intrinsic value of nature to a greater extent compared with Polish respondents; in total, 76% of Brazilians respondents entirely agreed that “Nature, its plants and animals have a value on their own, independent of their usefulness for us” versus 25% of Polish respondents. Our study contributes to a better understanding of the leverage points driving pro-environmental attitudes in both countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka E. Latawiec & Rodrigo Penna-Firme & Ingrid A.B. Pena & Bernardo B.N. Strassburg & Adam Drosik & Maciej Kubon & Hubert Latala & Katarzyna Grotkiewicz & Krzysztof Kubon & Pedro Teixeira & Luca, 2020. "Perception-Based Study on the Value of Nature to People and Land Sparing for Nature in Brazil and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8860-:d:434609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8860/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8860/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E.M. Bridges & J.H.V. Van Baren, 1997. "Soil: An Overlooked, Undervalued And Vital Part Of The Human Environment," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 15-20, March.
    2. Chris Sandbrook & Janet A. Fisher & George Holmes & Rogelio Luque-Lora & Aidan Keane, 2019. "The global conservation movement is diverse but not divided," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(4), pages 316-323, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Bebbington & Tom Cuckston & C. Feger, 2021. "Biodiversity," Post-Print hal-03746729, HAL.
    2. Li Li & Yiting Dong & Wen Shuai, 2024. "Navigating Epidemics: the Interplay of Risk Perception, Information Diversity, and Healthy Eating Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14521-14545, September.
    3. Schaal, Tamara & Jacobs, Annie & Leventon, Julia & Scheele, Ben C. & Lindenmayer, David & Hanspach, Jan, 2022. "‘You can’t be green if you’re in the red’: Local discourses on the production-biodiversity intersection in a mixed farming area in south-eastern Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. van de Water, Antoinette & Henley, Michelle & Bates, Lucy & Slotow, Rob, 2022. "The value of elephants: A pluralist approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    5. Phelps, Jacob & Zabala, Aiora & Daeli, Willy & Carmenta, Rachel, 2021. "Experts and resource users split over solutions to peatland fires," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    6. Dempsey, Benedict, 2021. "Understanding conflicting views in conservation: An analysis of England," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Stefan Partelow & Klara Johanna Winkler & Gregory M Thaler, 2020. "Environmental non-governmental organizations and global environmental discourse," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8860-:d:434609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.