IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7403-d411112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Analysis of Geopolymer Brick Manufacturing: A French Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Youssef

    (Centrale Lille, UMR 9013–LaMcube–Laboratoire de Mécanique, Multiphysique, Multi-échelle, F-59000 Lille, France)

  • Zoubeir Lafhaj

    (Centrale Lille, UMR 9013–LaMcube–Laboratoire de Mécanique, Multiphysique, Multi-échelle, F-59000 Lille, France)

  • Christophe Chapiseau

    (Briqueteries du Nord (BdN), Port Fluvial, 59000 Lille, France)

Abstract

This paper presents an economic analysis of manufacturing geopolymer bricks for use in the construction sector. The manufacturing processes of both geopolymer bricks and traditional fired bricks were investigated. For this study, we collected and analyzed all phases of geopolymer brick production from the extraction of raw materials to storage. Seven formulations of geopolymer bricks based on clay and waste bricks were analyzed. We considered the cost of raw materials and logistics operations in the production line of brick manufacturing. The results of this study prove that the manufacturing cost of geopolymer bricks based on clay provides an economic gain of 5% compared to fired bricks for the same compressive strength of 20 MPa. In the case of waste bricks, for the same production cost, the compressive strength of the geopolymer bricks is double that of fired bricks. Hence, this study shows the economic interest in the industrial production of geopolymer bricks. It also confirms that future research is needed that focuses on necessary changes to the current industrial production chain required for the manufacture of geopolymer bricks.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Youssef & Zoubeir Lafhaj & Christophe Chapiseau, 2020. "Economic Analysis of Geopolymer Brick Manufacturing: A French Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7403-:d:411112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7403/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7403/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther Obonyo & Elie Kamseu & Uphie C. Melo & Cristina Leonelli, 2011. "Advancing the Use of Secondary Inputs in Geopolymer Binders for Sustainable Cementitious Composites: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Eduardo-Javier Elizondo-Martinez & Piergiorgio Tataranni & Jorge Rodriguez-Hernandez & Daniel Castro-Fresno, 2020. "Physical and Mechanical Characterization of Sustainable and Innovative Porous Concrete for Urban Pavements Containing Metakaolin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Wei-Hao Lee & Ta-Wui Cheng & Kuan-Yu Lin & Kae-Long Lin & Chia-Cheng Wu & Chih-Ta Tsai, 2020. "Geopolymer Technologies for Stabilization of Basic Oxygen Furnace Slags and Sustainable Application as Construction Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Martin Sisol & Dušan Kudelas & Michal Marcin & Tomáš Holub & Peter Varga, 2019. "Statistical Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Slag Based Alkali-Activated Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Numanuddin M. Azad & S.M. Samindi M.K. Samarakoon, 2021. "Utilization of Industrial By-Products/Waste to Manufacture Geopolymer Cement/Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Numanuddin M. Azad & S.M. Samindi M.K. Samarakoon, 2021. "Utilization of Industrial By-Products/Waste to Manufacture Geopolymer Cement/Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Ignacio Andrés-Doménech & Jose Anta & Sara Perales-Momparler & Jorge Rodriguez-Hernandez, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Spain: A Diagnosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Bi-Bo Dai & Yi Zou & Yan He & Ming Lan & Qian Kang, 2023. "Solidification Experiment of Lithium-Slag and Fine-Tailings Based Geopolymers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Yeou-Fong Li & Walter Chen & Ta-Wui Cheng, 2022. "The Sustainable Composite Materials in Civil and Architectural Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-3, February.
    5. Ana Isabel Abellán García & Noelia Cruz Pérez & Juan C. Santamarta, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Spain: Analysis of the Research on SUDS Based on Climatology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Fawaz Alharbi & Meshal Almoshaogeh & Md. Shafiquzzaman & Husnain Haider & Md. Rafiquzzaman & Ahmed Alragi & Sherif ElKholy & ELSaid Abdallah Bayoumi & Yassine EL-Ghoul, 2021. "Development of Rice Bran Mixed Porous Clay Bricks for Permeable Pavements: A Sustainable LID Technique for Arid Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Jordi Payá & José Monzó & Josefa Roselló & María Victoria Borrachero & Alba Font & Lourdes Soriano, 2020. "Sustainable Soil-Compacted Blocks Containing Blast Furnace Slag (BFS) Activated with Olive Stone BIOMASS Ash (OBA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Natalia Wielgus & Marcin Górski & Jan Kubica, 2021. "Discarded Cathode Ray Tube Glass as an Alternative for Aggregate in a Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7403-:d:411112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.