IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6841-d402907.html

Assessment of Debris Flow Risk Factors Based on Meta-Analysis—Cases Study of Northwest and Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuzheng Wang

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

  • Lei Nie

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

  • Min Zhang

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

  • Hong Wang

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

  • Yan Xu

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

  • Tianyu Zuo

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

Abstract

Debris flow is a type of special torrent containing numerous solid materials. With many types of factors affecting debris flow, there is no reliable basis for the selection of risk factors for debris flow risk assessment. Therefore, to study the factors affecting debris flow, exploring a reliable method for assessing the relative importance of these factors is a significant endeavor in debris flow prevention and control work. In this research, debris flow risk assessment was combined with meta-analysis to analyze quantitatively the relative importance of risk factors of debris flow in northwest and southwest China. The final relative importance of each factor in northwest China is as follows, maximum relative height difference > slope of main channel > maximum daily precipitation > ratio of longitudinal slope > drainage area > length of main channel. In addition, in southwest China, maximum relative height difference > maximum daily precipitation > slope of main channel > ratio of longitudinal slope > length of main channel > drainage area. The meta-analysis results were accurate, which can provide a reliable basis for the selection of debris flow risk factors in debris flow risk assessment. Furthermore, it provides strong support for the application of meta-analysis in risk assessment of other geological hazards.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuzheng Wang & Lei Nie & Min Zhang & Hong Wang & Yan Xu & Tianyu Zuo, 2020. "Assessment of Debris Flow Risk Factors Based on Meta-Analysis—Cases Study of Northwest and Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6841-:d:402907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6841/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6841/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marttunen, Mika & Belton, Valerie & Lienert, Judit, 2018. "Are objectives hierarchy related biases observed in practice? A meta-analysis of environmental and energy applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 178-194.
    2. repec:wbk:wbpubs:7376 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Heidi Kreibich & Philip Bubeck & Mathijs Vliet & Hans Moel, 2015. "A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 967-989, August.
    4. Huayong Ni & Wanmo Zheng & Zongliang Li & Renji Ba, 2010. "Recent catastrophic debris flows in Luding county, SW China: geological hazards, rainfall analysis and dynamic characteristics," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 55(2), pages 523-542, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mateusz Trzeciak, 2021. "Sustainable Risk Management in IT Enterprises," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Fei Wang & Yongqiang Cao & Shuaibang Fan & Ruoning Zhang, 2022. "Study on the Identification and Classification of Key Influencing Factors of Debris-Flow-Prone Areas in Liaoning Province Based on Self-organizing Clustering and Sensitivity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Yongde Kang & Jingming Hou & Yu Tong & Baoshan Shi, 2021. "A Hydrodynamic-Based Robust Numerical Model for Debris Hazard and Risk Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ezbakhe, Fatine & Pérez-Foguet, Agustí, 2021. "Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 601-613.
    2. Jantsje M. Mol & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Julia E. Blasch & Hans de Moel, 2020. "Insights into Flood Risk Misperceptions of Homeowners in the Dutch River Delta," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 1450-1468, July.
    3. Han-Chung Yang & Cheng-Wu Chen, 2012. "Potential hazard analysis from the viewpoint of flow measurement in large open-channel junctions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(2), pages 803-813, March.
    4. Chenchen Qiu & Lijun Su & Xueyu Geng, 2024. "A precipitation downscaling framework for regional warning of debris flows in mountainous areas," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(2), pages 1979-2004, January.
    5. Osberghaus, Daniel & Botzen, W.J. Wouter & Kesternich, Martin, 2025. "The intention-behavior gap in climate change adaptation: Evidence from longitudinal survey data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Paweł Karczmarek & Witold Pedrycz & Adam Kiersztyn, 2021. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 463-481, April.
    7. Wistuba, Małgorzata & Malik, Ireneusz & Tie, Yongbo & Gorczyca, Elżbieta & Zhang, Xianzheng & Wang, Jiazhu & Lu, Tuo, 2024. "Indicating landslide hazard from tree rings – Ecosystem service provided by an alder forest in the hengduan Mts, Sichuan, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    9. Andreas N. Angelakis & Andrea G. Capodaglio & Mohammad Valipour & Jens Krasilnikoff & Abdelkader T. Ahmed & Laila Mandi & Vasileios A. Tzanakakis & Alper Baba & Rohitashw Kumar & Xiaoyun Zheng & Zhang, 2023. "Evolution of Floods: From Ancient Times to the Present Times (ca 7600 BC to the Present) and the Future," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-52, June.
    10. Frans Klijn & Bruno Merz & Edmund Penning-Rowsell & Zbigniew Kundzewicz, 2015. "Preface: climate change proof flood risk management," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 837-843, August.
    11. Zheng Wang & Ningsheng Chen & Guisheng Hu & Yong Zhang & Genxu Wang & Zheng Han, 2023. "Hydrometeorological triggering of periglacial debris flows using a Bayesian approach: a case study of the Hailuogou Gully region, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 2871-2888, April.
    12. Aubert, Alice H. & Esculier, Fabien & Lienert, Judit, 2020. "Recommendations for online elicitation of swing weights from citizens in environmental decision-making," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    13. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Anastasija Pozniak & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2021. "Assessment of the Sustainability of a Real Estate Project Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Chen Cao & Peihua Xu & Jianping Chen & Lianjing Zheng & Cencen Niu, 2016. "Hazard Assessment of Debris-Flow along the Baicha River in Heshigten Banner, Inner Mongolia, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Philip Bubeck & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Jonas Laudan & Jeroen C.J.H. Aerts & Annegret H. Thieken, 2018. "Insights into Flood‐Coping Appraisals of Protection Motivation Theory: Empirical Evidence from Germany and France," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(6), pages 1239-1257, June.
    16. Mika Marttunen & Jyri Mustajoki, 2018. "Use of Analyst-Generated Stakeholder Preference Profiles in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis — Experiences from an Urban Planning Case," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-29, September.
    17. Wen Zhang & Jian-ping Chen & Qing Wang & Yuke An & Xin Qian & Liangjun Xiang & Longxiang He, 2013. "Susceptibility analysis of large-scale debris flows based on combination weighting and extension methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 66(2), pages 1073-1100, March.
    18. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Miebs, Grzegorz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2022. "Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 633-651.
    19. Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Belton, Valerie & Hjerppe, Turo & Marttunen, Mika, 2020. "Utilizing ecosystem service classifications in multi-criteria decision analysis – Experiences of peat extraction case in Finland," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    20. Edgar Mascarenhas & Mónica D. Oliveira, 2025. "Correction to: Leveraging Group Decision Aiding with Decision Conferencing: A Systematic Review and a Roadmap for Future Research," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 435-438, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6841-:d:402907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.