IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6767-d401829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Pest Management through Improved Advice in Agricultural Extension

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Toepfer

    (Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, CABI Joint Laboratory for Biosafety, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Tao Zhang

    (Beijing Plant Protection Station, Beijing 100026, China)

  • Buyun Wang

    (Beijing Plant Protection Station, Beijing 100026, China)

  • Yan Qiao

    (Beijing Plant Protection Station, Beijing 100026, China)

  • Haomin Peng

    (Xing’an Plant Protection Station, Xing’an County, Guilin 541300, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China)

  • Huifeng Luo

    (Xing’an Plant Protection Station, Xing’an County, Guilin 541300, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China)

  • Xuanwu Wan

    (Sichuan Provincial Plant Protection Station, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China)

  • Rui Gu

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yue Zhang

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Han Ji

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Min Wan

    (Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, CABI Joint Laboratory for Biosafety, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

This 5-year study addresses how improved quality of agricultural extension may lead to more sustainable pest management. We studied 112 agricultural extension workers trained as plant doctors under the Plantwise program in China. They run 70 plant clinics in Beijing, Guangxi, and Sichuan provinces. We analysed 47,156 recommendations issued by these plant doctors to 13,051 different growers between 2012 and 2017, and this for 250 different plant health problems on 91 crops. We also interviewed growers who had taken queries to plant clinics. On average, 86% of plant doctors provided comprehensive integrated pest management recommendations to the growers, with a 16% improvement in comprehensiveness over years. This most often included advice of synthetic pesticides (66%) with its frequency not much changing with time. In contrast, as a likely result of Plantwise interventions and China’s pesticide reduction policies, recommendations for biological control increased from 2% to 42%, pest monitoring by 8%, and cultural control by 11%. Recommendations of problematic plant protection agents as listed in the Montreal Protocol, Stockholm or Rotterdam convention, or as highly toxic under WHO’s toxicity classification were already rare in 2013 (1.9%) and nearly phased out by 2017 (0.2%). About 92% of growers implemented the advice, suggesting that agricultural extension services may contribute to changes in agricultural practices at scale. Further investment in such agricultural extension services may be warranted instead of phasing them out.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Toepfer & Tao Zhang & Buyun Wang & Yan Qiao & Haomin Peng & Huifeng Luo & Xuanwu Wan & Rui Gu & Yue Zhang & Han Ji & Min Wan, 2020. "Sustainable Pest Management through Improved Advice in Agricultural Extension," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6767-:d:401829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min Wan & Rui Gu & Tao Zhang & Yue Zhang & Han Ji & Buyun Wang & Yan Qiao & Stefan Toepfer, 2019. "Conflicts of Interests When Connecting Agricultural Advisory Services with Agri-Input Businesses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sam M. Espinoza Vidaurre & Norma C. Velásquez Rodríguez & Renza L. Gambetta Quelopana & Ana N. Martinez Valdivia & Ernesto A. Leo Rossi & Kevin Mario Laura De La Cruz, 2023. "Understanding Factors That Influence Pest Risk in Olive Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6767-:d:401829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.